CGMU vs. VYM

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CGMU (Capital Group Municipal Income ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGMU is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Capital Group, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. CGMU is actively managed, while VYM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGMU returned 4.74%/yr vs 19.05%/yr for VYM. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CGMU charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.

Performance

CGMU vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGMU achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.96% return.

CGMU

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 1.50%
• 6M: 2.01%
• 1Y: 6.84%
• 3Y*: 4.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VYM

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 2.98%
• YTD: 12.96%
• 6M: 13.69%
• 1Y: 27.70%
• 3Y*: 19.05%
• 5Y*: 11.67%
• 10Y*: 11.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGMU vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF	1.50%	5.19%	2.64%	6.76%	4.53%
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF	12.96%	15.42%	17.60%	6.57%	4.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CGMU and VYM is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022	0.12

Return for Risk

CGMU vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGMU

CGMU Risk / Return Rank: 75
CGMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CGMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CGMU Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CGMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CGMU Martin Ratio Rank: 50

VYM

VYM Risk / Return Rank: 82
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 81
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGMU vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGMU	VYM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.00	2.71	+0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.26	3.84	+0.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	1.49	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	4.20	-1.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.61	15.80	-7.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGMU vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGMU Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is comparable to the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGMU and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGMU	VYM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.00	2.71	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.67	0.51	+1.16

Drawdowns

CGMU vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGMU drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGMU and VYM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGMU	VYM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.11%	-56.98%	+52.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.55%	-6.69%	+4.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.89%	-14.46%	+10.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.84%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	0.00%	-0.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.84%	-7.20%	+6.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	1.78%	-1.00%

Volatility

CGMU vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) is 0.78%, while Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that CGMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGMU	VYM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.78%	2.88%	-2.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.72%	7.73%	-6.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29%	10.27%	-7.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.48%	13.96%	-10.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.48%	16.34%	-12.86%

CGMU vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGMU has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CGMU vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

CGMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than VYM's 2.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF	3.33%	3.32%	3.21%	3.08%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF	2.18%	2.44%	2.74%	3.12%	3.01%	2.76%	3.18%	3.03%	3.40%	2.80%	2.91%	3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGMU and VYM in my portfolio?

CGMU and VYM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGMU or VYM?

VYM has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to CGMU (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGMU dropped -4.11% vs VYM's -56.98%.

Which ETF is better, CGMU or VYM?

On 3-year performance, VYM leads with 19.05% vs 4.74% for CGMU. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, CGMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGMU or VYM?

Over the 3-year period, VYM has performed better with a 19.05% return vs 4.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGMU or VYM?

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for CGMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGMU or VYM?

CGMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 2.18% for VYM.

What is the main difference between CGMU and VYM?

CGMU is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while VYM is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for CGMU and 0.04% for VYM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.