PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VEA having a 16.41% return and VYM slightly higher at 16.57%. Over the past 10 years, VEA has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 10.24%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.


VEA

1D
1.66%
1M
1.99%
6M
9.00%
YTD
16.41%
1Y
30.82%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
10.24%
ALL TIME*
5.25%

VYM

1D
1.54%
1M
3.65%
6M
10.11%
YTD
16.57%
1Y
25.99%
3Y*
18.31%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*
11.86%
ALL TIME*
9.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$653.63M$753.15M$792.32M
$218.18M$204.80M$205.80M

VEA vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
16.41%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
16.57%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and VYM is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007

0.79

The correlation between VEA and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VEA vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEA
VYM

Financial Services

23.1%
21.0%

Technology

18.4%
17.8%

Industrials

17.9%
12.6%

Healthcare

7.9%
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
6.8%

Basic Materials

6.9%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
8.1%

Energy

4.5%
8.6%

Communication Services

3.2%
3.0%

Utilities

3.1%
5.7%

Real Estate

2.5%
0.0%

Financial Services

VEA
23.1%
VYM
21.0%

Technology

VEA
18.4%
VYM
17.8%

Industrials

VEA
17.9%
VYM
12.6%

Healthcare

VEA
7.9%
VYM
13.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VEA
7.3%
VYM
6.8%

Basic Materials

VEA
6.9%
VYM
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

VEA
5.3%
VYM
8.1%

Energy

VEA
4.5%
VYM
8.6%

Communication Services

VEA
3.2%
VYM
3.0%

Utilities

VEA
3.1%
VYM
5.7%

Real Estate

VEA
2.5%
VYM
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VEA vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEAVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.47

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

3.90

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.95

14.66

-4.71

VEA vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEA vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than VYM's maximum drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEAVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-56.98%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-6.69%

-4.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-14.46%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-15.84%

-13.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

-35.21%

-0.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

0.00%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.19%

-7.14%

-6.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

1.78%

+1.33%

Volatility

VEA vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.79%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEAVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

2.79%

+2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.43%

7.55%

+7.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.29%

10.28%

+7.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.86%

13.88%

+2.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.22%

16.31%

+0.91%

VEA vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEA vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than VYM's 2.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.51%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.20%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and VYM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to VYM (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.86% vs 10.24% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for VYM.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 2.20% for VYM.

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VYM is Dividend. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer