VEA vs. VFH
VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) and VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while VFH is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEA returned 10.14%/yr vs 12.59%/yr for VFH. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VEA charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFH.
Performance
VEA vs. VFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly higher than VFH's -4.26% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has underperformed VFH with an annualized return of 10.14%, while VFH has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.
VEA
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
VFH
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- -4.26%
- 6M
- -1.64%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
VEA vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 12.02% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | -4.26% | 14.91% | 30.44% | 14.17% | -12.31% | 35.22% | -1.96% | 31.57% | -13.52% | 19.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEA and VFH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VEA and VFH has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VEA vs. VFH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEA
VFH
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Financial Services
VEA
VFH
Industrials
VEA
VFH
Technology
VEA
VFH
Healthcare
VEA
VFH
Basic Materials
VEA
VFH
-
Consumer Cyclical
VEA
VFH
Consumer Defensive
VEA
VFH
-
Energy
VEA
VFH
-
Communication Services
VEA
VFH
Utilities
VEA
VFH
-
Real Estate
VEA
VFH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEA vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank
VEA
VFH
VEA vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VEA | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.06 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 0.28 | +2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.39 | 0.74 | +8.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VEA | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 0.28 | +1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.45 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.56 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.24 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
VEA vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and VFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEA | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.68% | -78.61% | +17.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -14.75% | +3.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -17.30% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -25.66% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.73% | -44.42% | +8.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.40% | -7.17% | +3.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.29% | -18.53% | +5.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 5.60% | -2.60% |
Volatility
VEA vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) at 4.28%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEA | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 4.28% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.91% | 11.34% | +2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.15% | 14.98% | +1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 19.34% | -2.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 22.56% | -5.16% |
VEA vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VFH's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VEA vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison
VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than VFH's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.69% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.53% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEA and VFH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEA has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to VFH (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs VFH's -78.61%.
On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 12.59% vs 10.14% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 12.59% return vs 10.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VFH.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.53% for VFH.
VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VFH is Financials Equities. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.09% for VFH.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VEA and VFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer