PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. VFH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. VFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly higher than VFH's -4.26% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has underperformed VFH with an annualized return of 10.14%, while VFH has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.


VEA

1D
1.00%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
12.02%
6M
14.95%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
10.14%

VFH

1D
-0.53%
1M
1.01%
YTD
-4.26%
6M
-1.64%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
12.02%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
-4.26%14.91%30.44%14.17%-12.31%35.22%-1.96%31.57%-13.52%19.99%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and VFH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between VEA and VFH has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VEA vs. VFH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEA
VFH

Financial Services

23.3%
96.8%

Industrials

19.2%
0.2%

Technology

13.8%
2.1%

Healthcare

8.2%
0.1%

Basic Materials

7.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%

-

Energy

5.4%

-

Communication Services

3.4%
0.0%

Utilities

3.3%

-

Real Estate

2.7%
0.8%

Financial Services

VEA
23.3%
VFH
96.8%

Industrials

VEA
19.2%
VFH
0.2%

Technology

VEA
13.8%
VFH
2.1%

Healthcare

VEA
8.2%
VFH
0.1%

Basic Materials

VEA
7.5%
VFH

-

Consumer Cyclical

VEA
7.5%
VFH
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

VEA
5.6%
VFH

-

Energy

VEA
5.4%
VFH

-

Communication Services

VEA
3.4%
VFH
0.0%

Utilities

VEA
3.3%
VFH

-

Real Estate

VEA
2.7%
VFH
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VFH
VFH Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEAVFHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.06

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

0.28

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

0.74

+8.64

VEA vs. VFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the VFH Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and VFH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEAVFHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

0.28

+1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.45

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.56

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.24

-0.01

Drawdowns

VEA vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and VFH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEAVFHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-78.61%

+17.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-14.75%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-17.30%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-25.66%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

-44.42%

+8.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-7.17%

+3.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-18.53%

+5.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

5.60%

-2.60%

Volatility

VEA vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) at 4.28%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEAVFHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

4.28%

+1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

11.34%

+2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

14.98%

+1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

19.34%

-2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

22.56%

-5.16%

VEA vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VFH's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEA vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than VFH's 1.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.69%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.53%1.55%1.75%2.08%2.31%1.87%2.21%2.17%2.30%1.53%1.63%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and VFH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to VFH (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs VFH's -78.61%.

On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 12.59% vs 10.14% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 12.59% return vs 10.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VFH.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.53% for VFH.

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VFH is Financials Equities. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.09% for VFH.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and VFH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer