PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. MGK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. MGK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly higher than MGK's 5.33% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has underperformed MGK with an annualized return of 10.72%, while MGK has yielded a comparatively higher 18.85% annualized return.


VEA

1D
0.34%
1M
3.58%
YTD
14.73%
6M
16.65%
1Y
31.41%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
10.72%

MGK

1D
0.22%
1M
-1.87%
YTD
5.33%
6M
6.21%
1Y
24.77%
3Y*
24.17%
5Y*
14.87%
10Y*
18.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.73%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
5.33%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%28.58%41.01%37.38%-2.91%29.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and MGK is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2007

0.75

The correlation between VEA and MGK shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VEA vs. MGK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEA
MGK

Financial Services

23.3%
4.5%

Industrials

19.2%
1.1%

Technology

13.8%
56.1%

Healthcare

8.2%
4.5%

Basic Materials

7.5%
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
0.4%

Energy

5.4%

-

Communication Services

3.4%
17.3%

Utilities

3.3%
1.2%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.3%

Financial Services

VEA
23.3%
MGK
4.5%

Industrials

VEA
19.2%
MGK
1.1%

Technology

VEA
13.8%
MGK
56.1%

Healthcare

VEA
8.2%
MGK
4.5%

Basic Materials

VEA
7.5%
MGK
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VEA
7.5%
MGK
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

VEA
5.6%
MGK
0.4%

Energy

VEA
5.4%
MGK

-

Communication Services

VEA
3.4%
MGK
17.3%

Utilities

VEA
3.3%
MGK
1.2%

Real Estate

VEA
2.7%
MGK
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEAMGKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.24

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

1.37

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.92

4.65

+5.27

VEA vs. MGK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the MGK Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and MGK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEA vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than MGK's maximum drawdown of -48.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and MGK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEAMGKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-48.43%

-12.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-16.85%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-23.36%

+9.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-36.01%

+6.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

-36.01%

+0.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-5.63%

+4.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.28%

-7.58%

-5.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

4.97%

-1.95%

Volatility

VEA vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) at 5.96%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEAMGKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.84%

5.96%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.38%

13.29%

+1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.58%

16.87%

-0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

22.72%

-6.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

21.93%

-4.53%

VEA vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than MGK's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEA vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than MGK's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.33%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and MGK have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to MGK (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs MGK's -48.43%.

On 10-year performance, MGK leads with 18.85% vs 10.72% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 5.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGK has performed better with a 18.85% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGK.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.33% for MGK.

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MGK is Large Cap Growth Equities. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.05% for MGK.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and MGK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer