VEA vs. FNDC

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) and FNDC (Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while FNDC is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEA returned 10.72%/yr vs 9.15%/yr for FNDC. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VEA charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FNDC.

Performance

VEA vs. FNDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly higher than FNDC's 11.54% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has outperformed FNDC with an annualized return of 10.72%, while FNDC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.15% annualized return.

VEA

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 1.30%
• YTD: 14.73%
• 6M: 16.65%
• 1Y: 29.82%
• 3Y*: 19.03%
• 5Y*: 9.51%
• 10Y*: 10.72%

FNDC

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: -1.02%
• YTD: 11.54%
• 6M: 12.98%
• 1Y: 24.92%
• 3Y*: 17.46%
• 5Y*: 7.25%
• 10Y*: 9.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. FNDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF	14.73%	35.16%	3.15%	17.93%	-15.34%	11.66%	9.71%	22.62%	-14.75%	26.42%
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	11.54%	35.65%	1.38%	14.92%	-14.71%	10.26%	6.58%	20.58%	-19.10%	29.22%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and FNDC is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013	0.95

The correlation between VEA and FNDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VEA vs. FNDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VEA	FNDC
Financial Services	23.3%	11.5%
Industrials	19.2%	25.8%
Technology	13.8%	8.7%
Healthcare	8.2%	4.9%
Basic Materials	7.5%	11.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	12.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.6%	6.3%
Energy	5.4%	4.6%
Communication Services	3.4%	4.8%
Utilities	3.3%	2.8%
Real Estate	2.7%	6.9%

Return for Risk

VEA vs. FNDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA

VEA Risk / Return Rank: 62
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 63
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 63

FNDC

FNDC Risk / Return Rank: 56
FNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. FNDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VEA	FNDC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.69	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	2.40	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.31	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	2.23	+0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.92	8.23	+1.69

VEA vs. FNDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the FNDC Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and FNDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VEA vs. FNDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than FNDC's maximum drawdown of -43.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and FNDC.

Drawdown Indicators

	VEA	FNDC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.68%	-43.22%	-17.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.63%	-11.20%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.45%	-12.98%	-0.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.71%	-32.13%	+2.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.73%	-43.22%	+7.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	-1.93%	+0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.28%	-8.44%	-4.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	3.04%	-0.02%

Volatility

VEA vs. FNDC - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) at 5.51%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VEA	FNDC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.84%	5.51%	+1.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.38%	12.47%	+1.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.58%	14.81%	+1.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.72%	16.08%	+0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.40%	16.82%	+0.58%

VEA vs. FNDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDC's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

VEA vs. FNDC - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than FNDC's 3.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	3.46%	3.86%	3.59%	2.86%	1.98%	2.58%	1.77%	2.71%	2.68%	1.94%	1.95%	1.30%
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF	2.62%	3.22%	3.35%	3.15%	2.91%	3.16%	2.04%	3.04%	3.35%	2.77%	3.05%	2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VEA and FNDC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, VEA and FNDC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, VEA or FNDC?

VEA has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to FNDC (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs FNDC's -43.22%.

Which ETF is better, VEA or FNDC?

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.72% vs 9.15% for FNDC. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FNDC has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VEA or FNDC?

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 9.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VEA or FNDC?

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VEA or FNDC?

FNDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 2.62% for VEA.

What is the main difference between VEA and FNDC?

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FNDC is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while FNDC tracks Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.39% for FNDC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.