FNDC vs. DFISX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX).
FNDC is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. DFISX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Sep 30, 1996.
Performance
FNDC vs. DFISX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNDC vs. DFISX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF | 4.06% | 35.65% | 1.38% | 14.92% | -14.71% | 10.26% | 6.58% | 20.58% | -19.10% | 29.22% |
DFISX DFA International Small Company Portfolio | -1.97% | 36.35% | 3.76% | 14.46% | -17.13% | 10.71% | 9.27% | 24.18% | -19.42% | 24.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDC achieves a 4.06% return, which is significantly higher than DFISX's -1.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDC has outperformed DFISX with an annualized return of 8.54%, while DFISX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.66% annualized return.
FNDC
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- -8.25%
- YTD
- 4.06%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 33.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
DFISX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -11.77%
- YTD
- -1.97%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 26.89%
- 3Y*
- 14.28%
- 5Y*
- 6.58%
- 10Y*
- 7.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDC vs. DFISX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FNDC and DFISX have an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Return for Risk
FNDC vs. DFISX — Risk / Return Rank
FNDC
DFISX
FNDC vs. DFISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNDC | DFISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 1.66 | +0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.88 | 2.15 | +0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.33 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 2.04 | +0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.02 | 7.97 | +3.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNDC | DFISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 1.66 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.42 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.48 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.44 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDC and DFISX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FNDC vs. DFISX - Dividend Comparison
FNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than DFISX's 3.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF | 3.71% | 3.86% | 3.59% | 2.86% | 1.98% | 2.58% | 1.77% | 2.71% | 2.68% | 1.94% | 1.95% | 1.30% |
DFISX DFA International Small Company Portfolio | 3.21% | 3.19% | 3.39% | 3.01% | 3.51% | 3.06% | 1.71% | 4.54% | 7.74% | 1.27% | 4.44% | 4.47% |
Drawdowns
FNDC vs. DFISX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDC drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, smaller than the maximum DFISX drawdown of -60.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDC and DFISX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDC | DFISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.22% | -60.66% | +17.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.20% | -11.96% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.13% | -35.06% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.22% | -43.00% | -0.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.25% | -11.77% | +3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.53% | -11.69% | +3.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 3.06% | -0.18% |
Volatility
FNDC vs. DFISX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX) at 5.90%. This indicates that FNDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNDC | DFISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 5.90% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.30% | 10.04% | +0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.87% | 15.38% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.82% | 15.75% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 16.11% | +0.61% |