FNDC vs. SCHC
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC).
FNDC and SCHC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNDC is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. SCHC is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux). It was launched on Jan 14, 2010. Both FNDC and SCHC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNDC or SCHC.
Performance
FNDC vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDC achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly lower than SCHC's 2.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDC has outperformed SCHC with an annualized return of 5.34%, while SCHC has yielded a comparatively lower 4.24% annualized return.
FNDC
2.10%
-4.77%
-1.38%
10.13%
4.13%
5.34%
SCHC
2.60%
-5.28%
-2.41%
12.54%
3.62%
4.24%
Key characteristics
| FNDC | SCHC | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.85 | 0.82 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.24 | 1.20 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.15 | 1.15 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.78 | 0.53 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.01 | 4.16 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.88% | 2.82% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.62% | 14.21% |
| Max Drawdown | -43.22% | -43.94% |
| Current Drawdown | -8.23% | -12.59% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDC vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHC's 0.11% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between FNDC and SCHC is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNDC vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNDC vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison
FNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than SCHC's 2.72% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF | 2.88% | 2.86% | 1.98% | 2.58% | 1.77% | 2.71% | 2.68% | 1.94% | 1.96% | 1.30% | 1.61% | 0.64% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 2.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.72% | 2.01% | 2.34% | 2.59% | 2.80% |
Drawdowns
FNDC vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDC drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHC drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDC and SCHC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNDC vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) have volatilities of 3.98% and 3.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.