PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDC vs. DLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDC vs. DLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDC achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly higher than DLS's 6.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDC has outperformed DLS with an annualized return of 9.32%, while DLS has yielded a comparatively lower 8.34% annualized return.


FNDC

1D
-0.54%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
11.11%
6M
11.31%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
18.70%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
9.32%

DLS

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
6.66%
6M
7.69%
1Y
22.64%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
8.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDC vs. DLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDC
Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF
11.11%35.65%1.38%14.92%-14.71%10.26%6.58%20.58%-19.10%29.22%
DLS
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend
6.66%34.11%3.06%15.33%-17.31%11.71%-1.28%22.20%-18.95%31.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDC and DLS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.95

The correlation between FNDC and DLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDC vs. DLS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNDC
DLS

Industrials

25.3%
27.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%
12.7%

Financial Services

11.4%
13.4%

Basic Materials

11.3%
9.2%

Technology

10.1%
8.9%

Real Estate

6.6%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
7.6%

Healthcare

4.8%
3.6%

Communication Services

4.7%
4.3%

Energy

4.1%
2.7%

Utilities

2.6%
2.0%

Industrials

FNDC
25.3%
DLS
27.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FNDC
12.9%
DLS
12.7%

Financial Services

FNDC
11.4%
DLS
13.4%

Basic Materials

FNDC
11.3%
DLS
9.2%

Technology

FNDC
10.1%
DLS
8.9%

Real Estate

FNDC
6.6%
DLS
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

FNDC
6.1%
DLS
7.6%

Healthcare

FNDC
4.8%
DLS
3.6%

Communication Services

FNDC
4.7%
DLS
4.3%

Energy

FNDC
4.1%
DLS
2.7%

Utilities

FNDC
2.6%
DLS
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDC vs. DLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDC
FNDC Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

DLS
DLS Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
DLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDC vs. DLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDCDLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.30

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.06

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.83

7.37

+1.46

FNDC vs. DLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the DLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDC and DLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDC vs. DLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDC drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, smaller than the maximum DLS drawdown of -63.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDC and DLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDCDLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.22%

-63.13%

+19.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.20%

-11.04%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.98%

-12.69%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.13%

-32.22%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.22%

-44.77%

+1.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-3.18%

+0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-13.62%

+5.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

3.08%

-0.04%

Volatility

FNDC vs. DLS - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend (DLS) at 4.38%. This indicates that FNDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDCDLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

4.38%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.53%

11.49%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.81%

13.78%

+1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

15.62%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.81%

16.65%

+0.16%

FNDC vs. DLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DLS's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNDC vs. DLS - Dividend Comparison

FNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, which matches DLS's 3.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLS
WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend
3.50%3.87%4.56%4.29%4.96%3.29%2.50%3.37%3.66%2.79%3.29%2.72%
FNDC
Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF
3.47%3.86%3.59%2.86%1.98%2.58%1.77%2.71%2.68%1.94%1.95%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FNDC and DLS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNDC has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to DLS (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDC dropped -43.22% vs DLS's -63.13%.

On 10-year performance, FNDC leads with 9.32% vs 8.34% for DLS. On fees, FNDC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, DLS has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDC has performed better with a 9.32% return vs 8.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DLS.

DLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 3.47% for FNDC.

FNDC tracks Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US, while DLS tracks WisdomTree International SmallCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDC and 0.58% for DLS.

FNDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDC and DLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer