FNDC vs. FNDA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA).

FNDC and FNDA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNDC is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. FNDA is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both FNDC and FNDA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FNDC vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FNDC vs. FNDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	4.06%	35.65%	1.38%	14.92%	-14.71%	10.26%	6.58%	20.58%	-19.10%	29.22%
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF	3.11%	7.44%	9.00%	20.29%	-14.83%	31.12%	8.44%	24.34%	-12.12%	12.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDC achieves a 4.06% return, which is significantly higher than FNDA's 3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDC has underperformed FNDA with an annualized return of 8.54%, while FNDA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.01% annualized return.

FNDC

• 1D: 3.18%
• 1M: -8.25%
• YTD: 4.06%
• 6M: 7.77%
• 1Y: 33.13%
• 3Y*: 15.78%
• 5Y*: 7.24%
• 10Y*: 8.54%

FNDA

• 1D: 2.59%
• 1M: -5.58%
• YTD: 3.11%
• 6M: 4.77%
• 1Y: 19.91%
• 3Y*: 11.61%
• 5Y*: 6.25%
• 10Y*: 10.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDC vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDA's 0.25% expense ratio.

FNDC

Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF

FNDA

Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF

Return for Risk

FNDC vs. FNDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDC

FNDC Risk / Return Rank: 92
FNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
FNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FNDA

FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 56
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 51
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDC vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNDC	FNDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	0.91	+1.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	1.41	+1.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.19	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	1.40	+1.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.02	5.33	+5.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNDC vs. FNDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDC Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the FNDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDC and FNDA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNDC	FNDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	0.91	+1.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.30	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	0.45	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.45	+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between FNDC and FNDA is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FNDC vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison

FNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than FNDA's 1.21% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	3.71%	3.86%	3.59%	2.86%	1.98%	2.58%	1.77%	2.71%	2.68%	1.94%	1.95%	1.30%
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF	1.21%	1.22%	1.53%	1.37%	1.38%	1.15%	1.31%	1.38%	1.64%	1.30%	1.18%	1.33%

Drawdowns

FNDC vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDC drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, roughly equal to the maximum FNDA drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDC and FNDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDC	FNDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.22%	-44.64%	+1.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.20%	-14.42%	+3.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.13%	-25.92%	-6.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.22%	-44.64%	+1.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.25%	-6.96%	-1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.53%	-6.76%	-1.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	3.77%	-0.89%

Volatility

FNDC vs. FNDA - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) at 6.37%. This indicates that FNDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDC	FNDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.07%	6.37%	+0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.30%	12.74%	-2.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.87%	22.04%	-6.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.82%	21.01%	-5.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.72%	22.36%	-5.64%