PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. EFAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 14.71% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 2.87% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has outperformed EFAV with an annualized return of 11.09%, while EFAV has yielded a comparatively lower 6.44% annualized return.


VEA

1D
1.25%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
14.71%
6M
14.32%
1Y
31.05%
3Y*
19.91%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
11.09%

EFAV

1D
0.09%
1M
-2.63%
YTD
2.87%
6M
2.52%
1Y
8.94%
3Y*
12.70%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
6.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.71%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
2.87%26.00%5.30%12.52%-15.11%7.20%-0.06%16.67%-5.74%22.24%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and EFAV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.89

The correlation between VEA and EFAV shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VEA vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEA
EFAV

Financial Services

22.3%
19.4%

Industrials

17.5%
15.9%

Technology

16.6%
4.6%

Healthcare

7.6%
12.0%

Basic Materials

7.5%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
11.9%

Energy

4.7%
8.3%

Communication Services

3.2%
9.6%

Utilities

3.0%
8.8%

Real Estate

2.5%
3.0%

Financial Services

VEA
22.3%
EFAV
19.4%

Industrials

VEA
17.5%
EFAV
15.9%

Technology

VEA
16.6%
EFAV
4.6%

Healthcare

VEA
7.6%
EFAV
12.0%

Basic Materials

VEA
7.5%
EFAV
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VEA
7.4%
EFAV
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

VEA
5.5%
EFAV
11.9%

Energy

VEA
4.7%
EFAV
8.3%

Communication Services

VEA
3.2%
EFAV
9.6%

Utilities

VEA
3.0%
EFAV
8.8%

Real Estate

VEA
2.5%
EFAV
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEAEFAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.16

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

1.35

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.30

3.35

+6.95

VEA vs. EFAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the EFAV Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and EFAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEA vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than EFAV's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and EFAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEAEFAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-27.56%

-33.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-6.66%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-8.75%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-27.46%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

-27.56%

-8.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

-6.48%

+4.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-4.77%

-8.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.67%

+0.35%

Volatility

VEA vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) at 3.06%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEAEFAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

3.06%

+3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.77%

8.53%

+6.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.78%

10.54%

+6.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.77%

11.82%

+4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.20%

13.05%

+4.15%

VEA vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEA vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than EFAV's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
3.28%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.55%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and EFAV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to EFAV (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs EFAV's -27.56%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 11.09% vs 6.44% for EFAV. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 11.09% return vs 6.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFAV.

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 2.55% for VEA.

VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.20% for EFAV.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and EFAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer