VCIT vs. FLTR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VCIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF) and FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - VCIT tracks the Barclays U.S. 5-10 Year Corp Index while FLTR tracks the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VCIT returned 2.93%/yr vs 3.51%/yr for FLTR. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VCIT charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.

Performance

VCIT vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCIT achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 1.91% return. Over the past 10 years, VCIT has underperformed FLTR with an annualized return of 2.93%, while FLTR has yielded a comparatively higher 3.51% annualized return.

VCIT

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 0.18%
• 6M: 0.07%
• 1Y: 6.13%
• 3Y*: 6.00%
• 5Y*: 1.22%
• 10Y*: 2.93%

FLTR

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 6M: 2.40%
• 1Y: 5.30%
• 3Y*: 6.10%
• 5Y*: 4.49%
• 10Y*: 3.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCIT vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF	0.18%	9.34%	3.20%	8.98%	-13.98%	-1.77%	9.46%	14.10%	-1.74%	5.31%
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	1.91%	5.22%	7.38%	7.41%	0.74%	0.55%	1.44%	5.70%	0.30%	2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between VCIT and FLTR is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2011	0.04

Return for Risk

VCIT vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCIT

VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 42
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 40
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 42

FLTR

FLTR Risk / Return Rank: 99
FLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCIT vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VCIT	FLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	6.77	-5.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	12.78	-10.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	3.15	-1.88
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	16.96	-14.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.95	101.23	-94.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VCIT vs. FLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the FLTR Sharpe Ratio of 6.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCIT and FLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VCIT	FLTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	6.77	-5.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	2.11	-1.93
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.70	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.53	+0.23

Drawdowns

VCIT vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCIT drawdown since its inception was -20.56%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCIT and FLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	VCIT	FLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.56%	-17.84%	-2.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.96%	-0.31%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.11%	-1.93%	-4.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.56%	-3.06%	-17.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.56%	-17.84%	-2.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	-0.04%	-1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.16%	-0.67%	-2.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	0.05%	+0.83%

Volatility

VCIT vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) has a higher volatility of 1.38% compared to VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.25%. This indicates that VCIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VCIT	FLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.38%	0.25%	+1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.06%	0.62%	+2.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.10%	0.79%	+3.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.61%	2.13%	+4.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.28%	5.00%	+1.28%

VCIT vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCIT has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VCIT vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison

VCIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, more than FLTR's 4.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	4.73%	4.97%	5.93%	6.07%	2.29%	0.63%	1.49%	3.05%	2.67%	1.69%	1.16%	0.71%
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF	4.80%	4.62%	4.43%	3.72%	3.03%	2.87%	2.78%	3.37%	3.61%	3.21%	3.29%	3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VCIT and FLTR in my portfolio?

VCIT and FLTR have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VCIT or FLTR?

VCIT has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to FLTR (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCIT dropped -20.56% vs FLTR's -17.84%.

Which ETF is better, VCIT or FLTR?

On 10-year performance, FLTR leads with 3.51% vs 2.93% for VCIT. On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FLTR has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VCIT or FLTR?

Over the 10-year period, FLTR has performed better with a 3.51% return vs 2.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VCIT or FLTR?

VCIT is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for FLTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VCIT or FLTR?

VCIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 4.73% for FLTR.

What is the main difference between VCIT and FLTR?

VCIT tracks Barclays U.S. 5-10 Year Corp Index, while FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VCIT and 0.14% for FLTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.77 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.