VCIT vs. IGIB
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB).
VCIT and IGIB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VCIT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. 5-10 Year Corp Index. It was launched on Nov 19, 2009. IGIB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Intermediate Credit Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2007. Both VCIT and IGIB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VCIT or IGIB.
Key characteristics
| VCIT | IGIB | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.53% | -2.34% |
| 1Y Return | 1.26% | 1.57% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.65% | -2.51% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.12% | 1.27% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.46% | 2.11% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.25 | 0.29 |
| Daily Std Dev | 7.11% | 7.08% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.56% | -20.62% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.45% | -10.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between VCIT and IGIB is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VCIT vs. IGIB - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VCIT achieves a -2.53% return, which is significantly lower than IGIB's -2.34% return. Over the past 10 years, VCIT has outperformed IGIB with an annualized return of 2.46%, while IGIB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.11% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VCIT vs. IGIB - Expense Ratio Comparison
VCIT has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IGIB's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VCIT vs. IGIB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VCIT vs. IGIB - Dividend Comparison
VCIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, which matches IGIB's 4.08% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.05% | 3.72% | 3.03% | 2.87% | 2.78% | 3.37% | 3.61% | 3.21% | 3.29% | 3.34% | 3.34% | 4.00% |
IGIB iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.08% | 3.78% | 3.04% | 2.52% | 2.74% | 3.44% | 3.41% | 2.51% | 2.45% | 2.51% | 2.46% | 2.72% |
Drawdowns
VCIT vs. IGIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCIT drawdown since its inception was -20.56%, roughly equal to the maximum IGIB drawdown of -20.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCIT and IGIB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VCIT vs. IGIB - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and iShares Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGIB) have volatilities of 1.88% and 1.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.