VBCF vs. VUG

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

VBCF (Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBCF is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2032 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VBCF charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.

Performance

VBCF vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCF) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

VBCF

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -0.88%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VUG

• 1D: -3.62%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 5.80%
• 6M: 4.57%
• 1Y: 23.98%
• 3Y*: 24.49%
• 5Y*: 14.33%
• 10Y*: 17.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBCF vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
VBCF Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF	1.01%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between VBCF and VUG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026	0.64

Return for Risk

VBCF vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUG

VUG Risk / Return Rank: 38
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBCF vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCF) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VBCF	VUG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.24	0.61	+0.63

Drawdowns

VBCF vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBCF drawdown since its inception was -1.86%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCF and VUG.

Drawdown Indicators

	VBCF	VUG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.86%	-50.68%	+48.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.53%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.85%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-4.83%	+3.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.59%	-7.09%	+6.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.72%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VBCF	VUG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.17%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.68%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.33%	16.26%	-11.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.33%	22.27%	-17.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.33%	21.47%	-17.14%

VBCF vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBCF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VBCF vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

VBCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, more than VUG's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VBCF Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF	0.39%	0.41%	0.47%	0.58%	0.70%	0.48%	0.66%	0.95%	1.32%	1.14%	1.39%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VBCF and VUG in my portfolio?

VBCF and VUG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VBCF or VUG?

On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VBCF or VUG?

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VBCF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VBCF or VUG?

VBCF has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.39% for VUG.

What is the main difference between VBCF and VUG?

VBCF is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VBCF tracks ICE 2032 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCF and 0.03% for VUG.