VBCF vs. VXUS
VBCF (Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBCF is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2032 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VBCF charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
VBCF vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCF
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- -3.73%
- 1M
- -3.02%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 12.29%
- 1Y
- 26.30%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
VBCF vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCF Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.01% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 10.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCF and VXUS is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCF vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
VBCF
VXUS
VBCF vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCF) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBCF | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 0.37 | +0.87 |
Drawdowns
VBCF vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCF drawdown since its inception was -1.86%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCF and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCF | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.86% | -35.97% | +34.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -4.52% | +3.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -8.21% | +7.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.89% | — |
Volatility
VBCF vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCF | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.33% | 15.67% | -11.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.33% | 16.12% | -11.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.33% | 17.19% | -12.86% |
VBCF vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBCF vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
VBCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than VXUS's 2.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBCF Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.75% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBCF and VXUS have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VBCF.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 0.50% for VBCF.
VBCF is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VXUS is Global Equities. VBCF tracks ICE 2032 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCF and 0.05% for VXUS.
Find the right allocation for VBCF and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer