VBCF vs. FLTR

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

VBCF (Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF) and FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - VBCF tracks the ICE 2032 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index while FLTR tracks the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VBCF charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.

Performance

VBCF vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCF) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

VBCF

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -0.88%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLTR

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 1.99%
• 6M: 2.48%
• 1Y: 5.34%
• 3Y*: 6.12%
• 5Y*: 4.50%
• 10Y*: 3.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBCF vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
VBCF Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF	1.01%
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	1.35%

Correlation

The correlation between VBCF and FLTR is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026	0.11

Return for Risk

VBCF vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTR

FLTR Risk / Return Rank: 99
FLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBCF vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCF) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VBCF	FLTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	6.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	2.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.24	0.53	+0.71

Drawdowns

VBCF vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBCF drawdown since its inception was -1.86%, smaller than the maximum FLTR drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCF and FLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	VBCF	FLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.86%	-17.84%	+15.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.31%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.93%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-3.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	0.00%	-1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.59%	-0.67%	+0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.05%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VBCF	FLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.62%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.33%	0.79%	+3.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.33%	2.13%	+2.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.33%	5.00%	-0.67%

VBCF vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBCF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VBCF vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison

VBCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than FLTR's 4.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	4.72%	4.97%	5.93%	6.07%	2.29%	0.63%	1.49%	3.05%	2.67%	1.69%	1.16%	0.71%
VBCF Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VBCF and FLTR in my portfolio?

VBCF and FLTR have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VBCF or FLTR?

On fees, VBCF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VBCF or FLTR?

VBCF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for FLTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VBCF or FLTR?

FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 0.50% for VBCF.

What is the main difference between VBCF and FLTR?

VBCF tracks ICE 2032 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while FLTR tracks MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCF and 0.14% for FLTR.