VBCF vs. IGBH
VBCF (Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF) and IGBH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - VBCF tracks the ICE 2032 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index while IGBH tracks the BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VBCF charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for IGBH.
Performance
VBCF vs. IGBH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCF
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGBH
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 7.30%
- 3Y*
- 7.79%
- 5Y*
- 5.22%
- 10Y*
- 4.87%
VBCF vs. IGBH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCF Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.27% |
IGBH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 3.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCF and IGBH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCF vs. IGBH — Risk / Return Rank
VBCF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IGBH
VBCF vs. IGBH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCF) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBCF | IGBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBCF vs. IGBH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCF drawdown since its inception was -1.86%, smaller than the maximum IGBH drawdown of -33.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCF and IGBH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCF | IGBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.86% | -33.67% | +31.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -0.94% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -2.64% | +2.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.16% | — |
Volatility
VBCF vs. IGBH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCF | IGBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.26% | 3.96% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.26% | 6.04% | -1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.26% | 9.19% | -4.93% |
VBCF vs. IGBH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IGBH's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBCF vs. IGBH - Dividend Comparison
VBCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than IGBH's 5.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGBH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.60% | 6.23% | 6.88% | 7.32% | 3.84% | 2.71% | 2.39% | 3.40% | 5.56% | 2.87% | 2.62% | 1.12% |
VBCF Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBCF and IGBH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VBCF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VBCF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for IGBH.
IGBH has the higher dividend yield at 5.60%, compared with 0.89% for VBCF.
VBCF tracks ICE 2032 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while IGBH tracks BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCF and 0.16% for IGBH.
Find the right allocation for VBCF and IGBH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer