PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAMO vs. PIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAMO vs. PIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAMO achieves a 3.15% return, which is significantly lower than PIE's 39.11% return. Over the past 10 years, VAMO has underperformed PIE with an annualized return of 5.64%, while PIE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.15% annualized return.


VAMO

1D
0.04%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
3.15%
6M
4.57%
1Y
18.13%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
5.64%

PIE

1D
-0.95%
1M
5.39%
YTD
39.11%
6M
38.18%
1Y
70.48%
3Y*
23.39%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAMO vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VAMO
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
3.15%16.51%6.11%5.58%8.55%32.16%-4.92%-4.63%-11.43%3.82%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
39.11%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%41.80%

Correlation

The correlation between VAMO and PIE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2015

0.33

VAMO vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VAMO
PIE

Financial Services

38.8%
14.4%

Energy

34.0%
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

33.5%
1.3%

Industrials

21.4%
16.8%

Healthcare

17.5%
5.1%

Technology

8.3%
47.0%

Basic Materials

7.3%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.5%
0.4%

Communication Services

5.0%
1.4%

Utilities

1.6%
1.3%

Real Estate

-

3.6%

Financial Services

VAMO
38.8%
PIE
14.4%

Energy

VAMO
34.0%
PIE
5.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VAMO
33.5%
PIE
1.3%

Industrials

VAMO
21.4%
PIE
16.8%

Healthcare

VAMO
17.5%
PIE
5.1%

Technology

VAMO
8.3%
PIE
47.0%

Basic Materials

VAMO
7.3%
PIE
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

VAMO
6.5%
PIE
0.4%

Communication Services

VAMO
5.0%
PIE
1.4%

Utilities

VAMO
1.6%
PIE
1.3%

Real Estate

VAMO

-

PIE
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAMO vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAMO
VAMO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAMO vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VAMOPIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.55

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

7.18

-3.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.47

23.52

-14.05

VAMO vs. PIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the PIE Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAMO and PIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VAMOPIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

3.24

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.35

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.48

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.12

+0.12

Drawdowns

VAMO vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAMO drawdown since its inception was -41.84%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAMO and PIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAMOPIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.84%

-72.98%

+31.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.55%

-9.87%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.61%

-28.69%

+17.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.25%

-40.32%

+23.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.84%

-40.32%

-1.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.76%

-1.17%

-1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.98%

-26.08%

+16.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

3.01%

-1.09%

Volatility

VAMO vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) is 2.97%, while Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a volatility of 9.00%. This indicates that VAMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAMOPIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

9.00%

-6.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.66%

17.77%

-10.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

21.91%

-10.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

20.23%

-2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

21.35%

-3.26%

VAMO vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAMO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

VAMO vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison

VAMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than PIE's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.70%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%
VAMO
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
0.63%1.41%0.84%1.35%1.10%1.07%1.03%1.15%1.03%0.35%0.56%0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAMO and PIE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIE has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to VAMO (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VAMO dropped -41.84% vs PIE's -72.98%.

On 10-year performance, PIE leads with 10.15% vs 5.64% for VAMO. On fees, VAMO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, VAMO has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PIE has performed better with a 10.15% return vs 5.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VAMO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

PIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.63% for VAMO.

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for VAMO and 0.90% for PIE.

PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAMO and PIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer