PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VAMO vs. FTLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VAMO vs. FTLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAMO achieves a 7.53% return, which is significantly higher than FTLS's 6.03% return. Over the past 10 years, VAMO has underperformed FTLS with an annualized return of 5.92%, while FTLS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.59% annualized return.


VAMO

1D
-0.46%
1M
2.63%
6M
4.61%
YTD
7.53%
1Y
21.53%
3Y*
12.37%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
5.92%
ALL TIME*
4.51%

FTLS

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.47%
6M
4.95%
YTD
6.03%
1Y
14.40%
3Y*
13.13%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
9.59%
ALL TIME*
9.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.26M$8.04M$8.94M
$140.83K$92.60K$940.22K

VAMO vs. FTLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VAMO
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
7.53%16.51%6.11%5.58%8.55%32.16%-4.92%-4.63%-11.43%3.82%
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
6.03%9.09%18.80%16.94%-5.56%19.65%2.56%16.16%-4.81%14.41%

Correlation

The correlation between VAMO and FTLS is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2015

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VAMO vs. FTLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VAMO
VAMO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FTLS
FTLS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FTLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VAMO vs. FTLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VAMOFTLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.28

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

3.55

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.59

10.80

-0.21

VAMO vs. FTLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the FTLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAMO and FTLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VAMO vs. FTLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAMO drawdown since its inception was -41.84%, which is greater than FTLS's maximum drawdown of -20.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAMO and FTLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VAMOFTLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.84%

-20.54%

-21.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.55%

-3.79%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.61%

-11.69%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.25%

-11.69%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.84%

-20.54%

-21.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.42%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.84%

-2.67%

-7.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.24%

+0.69%

Volatility

VAMO vs. FTLS - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) have volatilities of 2.12% and 2.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VAMOFTLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

2.15%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.29%

5.86%

+1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.00%

8.54%

+2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

10.53%

+6.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.10%

11.23%

+6.87%

VAMO vs. FTLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAMO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FTLS's 1.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

VAMO vs. FTLS - Dividend Comparison

VAMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than FTLS's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
0.88%1.07%1.50%1.49%0.81%0.01%0.44%0.83%0.87%0.43%1.04%0.49%
VAMO
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
0.61%1.41%0.84%1.35%1.10%1.07%1.03%1.15%1.03%0.35%0.56%0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


VAMO and FTLS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTLS has higher volatility (2.15%) compared to VAMO (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VAMO dropped -41.84% vs FTLS's -20.54%.

On 10-year performance, FTLS leads with 9.59% vs 5.92% for VAMO. On fees, VAMO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTLS has performed better with a 9.59% return vs 5.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VAMO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for FTLS.

FTLS has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.61% for VAMO.

VAMO is categorized as Momentum, while FTLS is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for VAMO and 1.38% for FTLS.

VAMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VAMO and FTLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer