VAMO vs. FTLS
Compare and contrast key facts about Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS).
VAMO and FTLS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VAMO is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Sep 8, 2015. FTLS is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Sep 9, 2014.
Performance
VAMO vs. FTLS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VAMO vs. FTLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF | 4.13% | 16.51% | 6.11% | 5.58% | 8.55% | 32.16% | -4.92% | -4.63% | -11.43% | 3.82% |
FTLS First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | -0.80% | 9.09% | 18.80% | 16.94% | -5.56% | 19.65% | 2.56% | 16.16% | -4.81% | 14.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VAMO achieves a 4.13% return, which is significantly higher than FTLS's -0.80% return. Over the past 10 years, VAMO has underperformed FTLS with an annualized return of 5.50%, while FTLS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.10% annualized return.
VAMO
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 4.13%
- 6M
- 6.61%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.63%
- 10Y*
- 5.50%
FTLS
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- -0.80%
- 6M
- 0.98%
- 1Y
- 10.88%
- 3Y*
- 12.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VAMO vs. FTLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VAMO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FTLS's 1.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VAMO vs. FTLS — Risk / Return Rank
VAMO
FTLS
VAMO vs. FTLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VAMO | FTLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.99 | 1.04 | +0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.86 | 1.56 | +1.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.21 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.01 | 1.90 | +2.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.07 | 8.02 | +5.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VAMO | FTLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 1.04 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.94 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.81 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.77 | -0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between VAMO and FTLS is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
VAMO vs. FTLS - Dividend Comparison
VAMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than FTLS's 0.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF | 0.63% | 1.41% | 0.84% | 1.35% | 1.10% | 1.07% | 1.03% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.35% | 0.56% | 0.20% |
FTLS First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.95% | 1.07% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 0.81% | 0.01% | 0.44% | 0.83% | 0.87% | 0.43% | 1.04% | 0.49% |
Drawdowns
VAMO vs. FTLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VAMO drawdown since its inception was -41.84%, which is greater than FTLS's maximum drawdown of -20.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAMO and FTLS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VAMO | FTLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.84% | -20.54% | -21.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.55% | -6.17% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.25% | -11.69% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.84% | -20.54% | -21.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -2.34% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.10% | -2.73% | -7.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | 1.49% | +0.21% |
Volatility
VAMO vs. FTLS - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) have volatilities of 3.04% and 2.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VAMO | FTLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 2.93% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 6.53% | +2.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.39% | 10.50% | +0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 10.65% | +7.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 11.31% | +6.78% |