VAMO vs. CLSE

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

VAMO (Cambria Value and Momentum ETF) and CLSE (Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VAMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Cambria, while CLSE is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Convergence Investment Partners. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VAMO returned 13.95%/yr vs 31.29%/yr for CLSE. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VAMO charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for CLSE.

Performance

VAMO vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VAMO achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly lower than CLSE's 24.77% return.

VAMO

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 1.34%
• YTD: 4.39%
• 6M: 3.05%
• 1Y: 19.78%
• 3Y*: 13.95%
• 5Y*: 9.24%
• 10Y*: 5.87%

CLSE

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 3.46%
• YTD: 24.77%
• 6M: 23.28%
• 1Y: 48.27%
• 3Y*: 31.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VAMO vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF	4.39%	16.51%	6.11%	5.58%	9.29%
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	24.77%	20.44%	35.54%	17.54%	-4.38%

Correlation

The correlation between VAMO and CLSE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2022	0.35

Return for Risk

VAMO vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAMO

VAMO Risk / Return Rank: 60
VAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
VAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
VAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 52
VAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
VAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 61

CLSE

CLSE Risk / Return Rank: 95
CLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VAMO vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VAMO	CLSE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	3.56	-1.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	4.80	-2.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.62	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.58	10.00	-6.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.28	36.36	-26.08

VAMO vs. CLSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VAMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the CLSE Sharpe Ratio of 3.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VAMO and CLSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VAMO vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAMO drawdown since its inception was -41.84%, which is greater than CLSE's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAMO and CLSE.

Drawdown Indicators

	VAMO	CLSE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.84%	-16.45%	-25.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.55%	-4.85%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.61%	-16.45%	+4.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.59%	-1.02%	-0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.94%	-3.56%	-6.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	1.33%	+0.60%

Volatility

VAMO vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) is 2.70%, while Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that VAMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VAMO	CLSE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.70%	4.22%	-1.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.65%	10.55%	-2.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.23%	13.65%	-2.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.18%	13.92%	+3.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.10%	13.92%	+4.18%

VAMO vs. CLSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAMO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSE's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

VAMO vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison

VAMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than CLSE's 0.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF	0.76%	0.95%	0.93%	1.21%	0.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF	0.62%	1.41%	0.84%	1.35%	1.10%	1.07%	1.03%	1.15%	1.03%	0.35%	0.56%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VAMO and CLSE in my portfolio?

VAMO and CLSE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VAMO or CLSE?

CLSE has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to VAMO (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VAMO dropped -41.84% vs CLSE's -16.45%.

Which ETF is better, VAMO or CLSE?

On 3-year performance, CLSE leads with 31.29% vs 13.95% for VAMO. On fees, VAMO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, VAMO has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VAMO or CLSE?

Over the 3-year period, CLSE has performed better with a 31.29% return vs 13.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VAMO or CLSE?

VAMO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CLSE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VAMO or CLSE?

CLSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.62% for VAMO.

What is the main difference between VAMO and CLSE?

VAMO is categorized as Momentum, while CLSE is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and Convergence Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for VAMO and 1.52% for CLSE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.56 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.