PortfoliosLab logo
VAMO vs. SCHG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between VAMO and SCHG is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

VAMO vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Value & Momentum ETF (VAMO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

VAMO:

5.54%

SCHG:

12.37%

Max Drawdown

VAMO:

0.00%

SCHG:

-0.96%

Current Drawdown

VAMO:

0.00%

SCHG:

-0.15%

Returns By Period


VAMO

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SCHG

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VAMO vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VAMO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

VAMO vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAMO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VAMO is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VAMO is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VAMO is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VAMO is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VAMO is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VAMO is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHG is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHG is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHG is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

VAMO vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Value & Momentum ETF (VAMO) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

VAMO vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

VAMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than SCHG's 0.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
VAMO
Cambria Value & Momentum ETF
1.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VAMO vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VAMO drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -0.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VAMO and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

VAMO vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...