PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
V vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

V vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Visa Inc. (V) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, V achieves a -7.69% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, V has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 15.98%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.50% annualized return.


V

1D
1.05%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
-7.69%
6M
-6.93%
1Y
-7.91%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
15.98%

SCHG

1D
0.12%
1M
-3.66%
YTD
2.58%
6M
2.96%
1Y
20.32%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
14.33%
10Y*
18.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

V vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
V
Visa Inc.
-7.69%11.76%22.32%26.31%-3.40%-0.31%17.12%43.33%16.49%47.18%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
2.58%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between V and SCHG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between V and SCHG has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

V vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

V
V Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
V Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
V Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
V Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
V Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

V vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Visa Inc. (V) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.21

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

1.14

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.57

3.78

-5.35

V vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

V vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V drawdown since its inception was -51.90%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.90%

-34.59%

-17.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.18%

-16.41%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.38%

-23.39%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.60%

-34.59%

+5.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.36%

-34.59%

-1.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.96%

-5.33%

-7.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-5.20%

-3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.73%

4.96%

+5.77%

Volatility

V vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Visa Inc. (V) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.14%. This indicates that V's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

5.14%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.57%

12.30%

+5.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.35%

15.95%

+6.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.82%

22.33%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.45%

21.58%

+2.87%

Dividends

V vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

V's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
V
Visa Inc.
0.81%0.70%0.68%0.72%0.76%0.62%0.56%0.56%0.67%0.61%0.75%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


V and SCHG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

V has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to SCHG (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, V dropped -51.90% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for V and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer