PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
V vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

V vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Visa Inc. (V) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with V having a 4.87% return and NVDA slightly lower at 4.71%. Over the past 10 years, V has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 17.51%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 63.94% annualized return.


V

1D
-0.67%
1M
6.76%
6M
10.85%
YTD
4.87%
1Y
5.20%
3Y*
16.38%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
17.51%
ALL TIME*
19.91%

NVDA

1D
2.65%
1M
-2.52%
6M
1.44%
YTD
4.71%
1Y
8.94%
3Y*
61.11%
5Y*
58.61%
10Y*
63.94%
ALL TIME*
36.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.58B$26.16B$31.92B
$2.59B$2.89B$2.79B

V vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
V
Visa Inc.
4.87%11.76%22.32%26.31%-3.40%-0.31%17.12%43.33%16.49%47.18%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
4.71%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between V and NVDA is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2008

0.38

The correlation between V and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

V:

$672.87B

NVDA:

$4.72T

EPS

V:

$15.55

NVDA:

$6.53

PE Ratio

V:

23.55

NVDA:

29.86

PEG Ratio

V:

1.45

NVDA:

0.16

PS Ratio

V:

11.96

NVDA:

18.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

V:

$44.49B

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

V:

$8.74B

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

V:

$27.77B

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

V vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

V
V Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
V Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
V Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
V Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
V Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

V vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Visa Inc. (V) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.07

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

0.44

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.67

0.91

-0.24

V vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current V Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of V and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

V vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum V drawdown since its inception was -51.90%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for V and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.90%

-89.72%

+37.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.18%

-20.21%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.38%

-36.88%

+16.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.29%

-66.34%

+39.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.36%

-66.34%

+29.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-17.17%

+16.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-36.08%

+27.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.76%

9.86%

-2.10%

Volatility

V vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Visa Inc. (V) is 6.94%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 11.73%. This indicates that V experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

11.73%

-4.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.26%

28.16%

-10.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.05%

36.36%

-14.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.94%

51.88%

-28.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.44%

49.95%

-25.51%

Dividends

V vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

V's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
V
Visa Inc.
0.71%0.70%0.68%0.72%0.76%0.62%0.56%0.56%0.67%0.61%0.75%0.64%

Financials

V vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Visa Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


V and NVDA have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (11.73%) compared to V (6.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, V dropped -51.90% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for V and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer