UYG vs. XPP

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

UYG (ProShares Ultra Financials) and XPP (ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - UYG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (200%) while XPP tracks the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UYG returned 17.73%/yr vs -5.00%/yr for XPP. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

UYG vs. XPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) and ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UYG achieves a -7.85% return, which is significantly higher than XPP's -19.06% return. Over the past 10 years, UYG has outperformed XPP with an annualized return of 17.73%, while XPP has yielded a comparatively lower -5.00% annualized return.

UYG

• 1D: 2.73%
• 1M: 8.46%
• YTD: -7.85%
• 6M: -7.84%
• 1Y: 4.18%
• 3Y*: 29.02%
• 5Y*: 10.61%
• 10Y*: 17.73%

XPP

• 1D: 2.14%
• 1M: -15.80%
• YTD: -19.06%
• 6M: -20.73%
• 1Y: -14.63%
• 3Y*: 4.75%
• 5Y*: -20.00%
• 10Y*: -5.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UYG vs. XPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UYG ProShares Ultra Financials	-7.85%	19.77%	55.71%	22.14%	-32.11%	76.26%	-20.32%	66.15%	-22.61%	39.28%
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50	-19.06%	45.84%	38.18%	-34.77%	-50.06%	-40.45%	7.07%	24.88%	-31.36%	80.21%

Correlation

The correlation between UYG and XPP is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2009	0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between UYG and XPP has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

UYG vs. XPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UYG	XPP
Financial Services	98.0%	43.8%
Technology	1.7%	-
Industrials	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

UYG vs. XPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UYG

UYG Risk / Return Rank: 12
UYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
UYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
UYG Omega Ratio Rank: 12
UYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
UYG Martin Ratio Rank: 11

XPP

XPP Risk / Return Rank: 6
XPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
XPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
XPP Omega Ratio Rank: 7
XPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
XPP Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UYG vs. XPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) and ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UYG	XPP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.14	-0.37	+0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.39	-0.29	+0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	0.97	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.15	-0.43	+0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.35	-0.87	+1.21

UYG vs. XPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UYG Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is higher than the XPP Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UYG and XPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UYG vs. XPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UYG drawdown since its inception was -97.90%, which is greater than XPP's maximum drawdown of -89.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYG and XPP.

Drawdown Indicators

	UYG	XPP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.90%	-89.90%	-8.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.91%	-34.03%	+5.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.35%	-52.95%	+22.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.77%	-85.24%	+37.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.98%	-89.90%	+19.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.97%	-78.58%	+65.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.29%	-47.86%	-15.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.16%	16.88%	-4.72%

Volatility

UYG vs. XPP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) is 8.35%, while ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) has a volatility of 12.76%. This indicates that UYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UYG	XPP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.35%	12.76%	-4.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.51%	28.73%	-6.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.37%	39.23%	-9.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.22%	62.75%	-26.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.06%	54.86%	-13.80%

UYG vs. XPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UYG and XPP have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

UYG vs. XPP - Dividend Comparison

UYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.68%, more than XPP's 2.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UYG ProShares Ultra Financials	12.68%	11.72%	0.51%	0.79%	0.77%	9.39%	0.66%	0.90%	1.28%	0.56%	0.76%	0.72%
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50	2.68%	2.32%	2.96%	2.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.81%	1.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UYG and XPP in my portfolio?

UYG and XPP have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UYG or XPP?

XPP has higher volatility (12.76%) compared to UYG (8.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYG dropped -97.90% vs XPP's -89.90%.

Which ETF is better, UYG or XPP?

On 10-year performance, UYG leads with 17.73% vs -5.00% for XPP. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UYG has been the lower-risk option at 8.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UYG or XPP?

Over the 10-year period, UYG has performed better with a 17.73% return vs -5.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UYG or XPP?

UYG and XPP have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UYG or XPP?

UYG has the higher dividend yield at 12.68%, compared with 2.68% for XPP.

What is the main difference between UYG and XPP?

UYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (200%), while XPP tracks FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.