PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UYG vs. UBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UYG vs. UBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) and ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury (UBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UYG achieves a -6.60% return, which is significantly lower than UBT's 1.80% return. Over the past 10 years, UYG has outperformed UBT with an annualized return of 18.50%, while UBT has yielded a comparatively lower -8.70% annualized return.


UYG

1D
0.38%
1M
9.36%
YTD
-6.60%
6M
-9.22%
1Y
1.43%
3Y*
30.40%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
18.50%

UBT

1D
0.18%
1M
4.56%
YTD
1.80%
6M
0.36%
1Y
3.64%
3Y*
-9.52%
5Y*
-17.73%
10Y*
-8.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UYG vs. UBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UYG
ProShares Ultra Financials
-6.60%19.77%55.71%22.14%-32.11%76.26%-20.32%66.15%-22.61%39.28%
UBT
ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury
1.80%2.03%-21.81%-3.68%-55.54%-12.14%31.87%24.46%-6.54%16.12%

Correlation

The correlation between UYG and UBT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2010

-0.30

The correlation between UYG and UBT shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (all time) to 0.13 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UYG vs. UBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UYG
UYG Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
UYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
UYG Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
UYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
UYG Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

UBT
UBT Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
UBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBT Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
UBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UYG vs. UBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) and ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury (UBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UYGUBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.03

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

0.13

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.15

0.30

-0.15

UYG vs. UBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UYG Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the UBT Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UYG and UBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UYG vs. UBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UYG drawdown since its inception was -97.90%, which is greater than UBT's maximum drawdown of -78.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UYG and UBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UYGUBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.90%

-78.90%

-19.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.91%

-16.86%

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.35%

-35.81%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.77%

-72.49%

+24.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.98%

-78.90%

+8.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.79%

-75.58%

+63.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.19%

-32.47%

-30.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.34%

7.48%

+4.86%

Volatility

UYG vs. UBT - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) has a higher volatility of 7.98% compared to ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury (UBT) at 4.87%. This indicates that UYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UYGUBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.98%

4.87%

+3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.38%

13.24%

+9.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.93%

18.96%

+9.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.12%

31.23%

+4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.90%

29.23%

+11.67%

UYG vs. UBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UYG and UBT have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

UYG vs. UBT - Dividend Comparison

UYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.50%, more than UBT's 3.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UBT
ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury
3.36%4.26%4.50%3.54%0.30%0.00%0.26%1.50%1.55%1.37%0.75%1.56%
UYG
ProShares Ultra Financials
12.50%11.72%0.51%0.79%0.77%9.39%0.66%0.90%1.28%0.56%0.76%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


UYG and UBT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UYG has higher volatility (7.98%) compared to UBT (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UYG dropped -97.90% vs UBT's -78.90%.

On 10-year performance, UYG leads with 18.50% vs -8.70% for UBT. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UBT has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UYG has performed better with a 18.50% return vs -8.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UYG and UBT have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

UYG has the higher dividend yield at 12.50%, compared with 3.36% for UBT.

UYG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UBT is Leveraged Bonds. UYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (200%), while UBT tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (200%).

UBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UYG and UBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer