UBT vs. QLD
UBT (ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - UBT is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (200%), while QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UBT returned -8.46%/yr vs 37.21%/yr for QLD. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UBT vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBT achieves a -1.00% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 38.76% return. Over the past 10 years, UBT has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of -8.46%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 37.21% annualized return.
UBT
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -1.75%
- 1Y
- 2.54%
- 3Y*
- -10.45%
- 5Y*
- -18.46%
- 10Y*
- -8.46%
QLD
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 38.76%
- 6M
- 36.36%
- 1Y
- 82.33%
- 3Y*
- 46.92%
- 5Y*
- 23.39%
- 10Y*
- 37.21%
UBT vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBT ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury | -1.00% | 2.03% | -21.81% | -3.68% | -55.54% | -12.14% | 31.87% | 24.46% | -6.54% | 16.12% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 38.76% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBT and QLD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2010 | -0.19 |
The correlation between UBT and QLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBT vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
UBT
QLD
UBT vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury (UBT) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UBT | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.37 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | 3.29 | -3.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 11.19 | -10.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UBT vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBT drawdown since its inception was -78.90%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBT and QLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBT | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.90% | -83.13% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.86% | -25.13% | +8.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.47% | -42.29% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.49% | -63.68% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.90% | -63.68% | -15.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.25% | -2.83% | -73.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.42% | -18.14% | -14.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.41% | 7.38% | +0.03% |
Volatility
UBT vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury (UBT) is 4.42%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 16.77%. This indicates that UBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBT | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 16.77% | -12.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.07% | 28.19% | -15.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.91% | 35.17% | -16.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.23% | 45.24% | -14.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.32% | 44.82% | -15.50% |
UBT vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UBT and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UBT vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
UBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than QLD's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
UBT ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury | 3.93% | 4.26% | 4.50% | 3.54% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.26% | 1.50% | 1.55% | 1.37% | 0.75% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBT and QLD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLD has higher volatility (16.77%) compared to UBT (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBT dropped -78.90% vs QLD's -83.13%.
On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 37.21% vs -8.46% for UBT. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UBT has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 37.21% return vs -8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UBT and QLD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
UBT has the higher dividend yield at 3.93%, compared with 0.12% for QLD.
UBT is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while QLD is Leveraged Equities. UBT tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (200%), while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%).
QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UBT and QLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer