PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USIBX vs. USSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USIBX vs. USSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund (USIBX) and USAA Science & Technology Fund (USSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USIBX achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than USSCX's 21.67% return. Over the past 10 years, USIBX has underperformed USSCX with an annualized return of 2.86%, while USSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.29% annualized return.


USIBX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.16%
6M
0.23%
YTD
0.33%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
4.93%
5Y*
0.64%
10Y*
2.86%

USSCX

1D
-0.35%
1M
4.31%
6M
18.84%
YTD
21.67%
1Y
36.73%
3Y*
26.36%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
15.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USIBX vs. USSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USIBX
USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund
0.33%7.48%2.84%6.74%-12.69%0.85%9.64%11.07%-0.97%5.91%
USSCX
USAA Science & Technology Fund
21.67%17.93%30.58%34.01%-41.76%-3.45%60.62%37.84%-4.34%36.06%

Correlation

The correlation between USIBX and USSCX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 1999

-0.10

The correlation between USIBX and USSCX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USIBX vs. USSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USIBX
USIBX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
USIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
USIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
USIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
USIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

USSCX
USSCX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
USSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
USSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USIBX vs. USSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund (USIBX) and USAA Science & Technology Fund (USSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USIBXUSSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.27

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.96

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.15

6.56

-2.41

USIBX vs. USSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USIBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the USSCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USIBX and USSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USIBX vs. USSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USIBX drawdown since its inception was -18.49%, smaller than the maximum USSCX drawdown of -79.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USIBX and USSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USIBXUSSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.49%

-79.48%

+60.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-18.19%

+15.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.37%

-28.82%

+23.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.49%

-52.07%

+33.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.49%

-52.70%

+34.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-1.58%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-30.95%

+28.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

5.43%

-4.45%

Volatility

USIBX vs. USSCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund (USIBX) is 1.14%, while USAA Science & Technology Fund (USSCX) has a volatility of 8.84%. This indicates that USIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USIBXUSSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

8.84%

-7.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.02%

18.84%

-15.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83%

22.73%

-18.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.75%

29.02%

-23.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.73%

26.66%

-21.93%

USIBX vs. USSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USIBX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than USSCX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

USIBX vs. USSCX - Dividend Comparison

USIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, less than USSCX's 7.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USIBX
USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund
4.78%4.56%4.47%3.71%3.17%4.92%6.84%4.93%3.67%3.45%3.86%4.35%
USSCX
USAA Science & Technology Fund
7.74%9.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%15.49%5.36%27.99%16.68%8.31%4.15%6.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


USIBX and USSCX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USSCX has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to USIBX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USIBX dropped -18.49% vs USSCX's -79.48%.

USSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USIBX and USSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer