USSCX vs. SCHG

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

USSCX (USAA Science & Technology Fund) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both funds - USSCX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Victory, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 10 years, USSCX returned 14.17%/yr vs 18.27%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. USSCX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

USSCX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Science & Technology Fund (USSCX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USSCX achieves a 13.59% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 4.99% return. Over the past 10 years, USSCX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 14.17%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.27% annualized return.

USSCX

• 1D: 4.51%
• 1M: -4.17%
• 6M: 15.49%
• YTD: 13.59%
• 1Y: 25.72%
• 3Y*: 22.21%
• 5Y*: 5.07%
• 10Y*: 14.17%
• ALL TIME*: 8.60%

SCHG

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 7.02%
• YTD: 4.99%
• 1Y: 16.16%
• 3Y*: 21.39%
• 5Y*: 13.15%
• 10Y*: 18.27%
• ALL TIME*: 16.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	$247.66M	$249.87M	$339.91M
USSCX USAA Science & Technology Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

USSCX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
USSCX USAA Science & Technology Fund	13.59%	17.93%	30.58%	34.01%	-41.76%	-3.45%	60.62%	37.84%	-4.34%	36.06%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	4.99%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between USSCX and SCHG is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009	0.90

The correlation between USSCX and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

USSCX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USSCX

USSCX Risk / Return Rank: 30
USSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
USSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
USSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
USSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
USSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 30
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USSCX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Science & Technology Fund (USSCX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	USSCX	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	0.82	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	1.20	+0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.15	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	0.83	+0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.10	2.62	+1.48

USSCX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USSCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USSCX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

USSCX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USSCX drawdown since its inception was -79.48%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USSCX and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	USSCX	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.48%	-34.59%	-44.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.19%	-16.41%	-1.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.82%	-23.39%	-5.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.07%	-34.59%	-17.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.70%	-34.59%	-18.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.11%	-3.10%	-5.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.90%	-5.19%	-25.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.68%	5.19%	+0.49%

Volatility

USSCX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

USAA Science & Technology Fund (USSCX) has a higher volatility of 8.71% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.32%. This indicates that USSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	USSCX	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.71%	4.32%	+4.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.99%	12.90%	+7.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.86%	16.67%	+7.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.15%	22.42%	+6.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.76%	21.59%	+5.17%

USSCX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

USSCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

USSCX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

USSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
USSCX USAA Science & Technology Fund	8.29%	9.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	15.49%	5.36%	27.99%	16.68%	8.31%	4.15%	6.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both USSCX and SCHG in my portfolio?

USSCX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, USSCX or SCHG?

USSCX has higher volatility (8.71%) compared to SCHG (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USSCX dropped -79.48% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.