USIBX vs. NOCBX
Compare and contrast key facts about USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund (USIBX) and Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX).
USIBX is managed by Victory Capital. It was launched on Aug 2, 1999. NOCBX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Mar 29, 2001.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: USIBX or NOCBX.
Key characteristics
| USIBX | NOCBX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.69% | 4.44% |
| 1Y Return | 11.40% | 10.35% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.60% | -1.88% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.07% | 0.34% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.93% | 1.79% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.94 | 1.58 |
| Daily Std Dev | 5.81% | 6.55% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.83% | -19.02% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.05% | -5.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between USIBX and NOCBX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
USIBX vs. NOCBX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, USIBX achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly higher than NOCBX's 4.44% return. Over the past 10 years, USIBX has outperformed NOCBX with an annualized return of 2.93%, while NOCBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.79% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USIBX vs. NOCBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USIBX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than NOCBX's 0.42% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
USIBX vs. NOCBX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund (USIBX) and Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
USIBX vs. NOCBX - Dividend Comparison
USIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than NOCBX's 3.62% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USIBX USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund | 4.27% | 4.09% | 3.19% | 4.98% | 6.60% | 4.93% | 3.68% | 3.45% | 3.86% | 4.34% | 4.25% | 4.42% |
NOCBX Northern Core Bond Fund | 3.62% | 3.65% | 2.86% | 1.68% | 3.65% | 2.67% | 3.06% | 2.90% | 2.75% | 3.24% | 2.59% | 2.77% |
Drawdowns
USIBX vs. NOCBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USIBX drawdown since its inception was -17.83%, smaller than the maximum NOCBX drawdown of -19.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USIBX and NOCBX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
USIBX vs. NOCBX - Volatility Comparison
USAA Intermediate Term Bond Fund (USIBX) has a higher volatility of 1.03% compared to Northern Core Bond Fund (NOCBX) at 0.98%. This indicates that USIBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOCBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.