PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USGRX vs. MUHLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USGRX vs. MUHLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Growth & Income Fund (USGRX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USGRX achieves a 9.42% return, which is significantly lower than MUHLX's 11.04% return. Over the past 10 years, USGRX has outperformed MUHLX with an annualized return of 13.04%, while MUHLX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.74% annualized return.


USGRX

1D
-0.61%
1M
3.53%
YTD
9.42%
6M
9.25%
1Y
24.69%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*
13.04%

MUHLX

1D
-0.44%
1M
-1.78%
YTD
11.04%
6M
11.42%
1Y
23.51%
3Y*
13.75%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USGRX vs. MUHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USGRX
USAA Growth & Income Fund
9.42%15.94%21.47%26.69%-18.52%22.53%17.45%21.78%-8.76%20.67%
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
11.04%17.82%3.38%13.92%2.89%28.98%11.96%14.39%-13.29%18.78%

Correlation

The correlation between USGRX and MUHLX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 1993

0.85

The correlation between USGRX and MUHLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USGRX vs. MUHLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USGRX
USGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
USGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
USGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
USGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
USGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

MUHLX
MUHLX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MUHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MUHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USGRX vs. MUHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Growth & Income Fund (USGRX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USGRXMUHLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.29

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

2.28

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.69

8.59

+6.10

USGRX vs. MUHLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the MUHLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USGRX and MUHLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USGRXMUHLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

1.67

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.72

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.63

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.52

-0.03

Drawdowns

USGRX vs. MUHLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USGRX drawdown since its inception was -56.93%, smaller than the maximum MUHLX drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USGRX and MUHLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USGRXMUHLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.93%

-62.05%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-10.23%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.29%

-18.63%

-10.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.81%

-18.63%

-12.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.48%

-40.85%

+6.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-3.98%

+3.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.71%

-10.77%

+2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.71%

-1.03%

Volatility

USGRX vs. MUHLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Growth & Income Fund (USGRX) is 2.21%, while Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) has a volatility of 3.13%. This indicates that USGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUHLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USGRXMUHLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

3.13%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.35%

10.95%

-3.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.16%

13.97%

-3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.85%

14.62%

+6.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.09%

17.04%

+3.05%

USGRX vs. MUHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USGRX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than MUHLX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

USGRX vs. MUHLX - Dividend Comparison

USGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%, more than MUHLX's 3.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
3.00%3.34%0.58%0.89%6.80%7.77%10.28%1.26%14.70%4.30%0.00%11.02%
USGRX
USAA Growth & Income Fund
7.51%8.06%20.65%0.93%12.58%11.97%0.84%24.69%11.92%5.12%1.26%6.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


USGRX and MUHLX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUHLX has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to USGRX (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USGRX dropped -56.93% vs MUHLX's -62.05%.

USGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USGRX and MUHLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer