PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USGRX vs. USNQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USGRX vs. USNQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Growth & Income Fund (USGRX) and USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with USGRX having a 11.67% return and USNQX slightly lower at 11.42%. Over the past 10 years, USGRX has underperformed USNQX with an annualized return of 13.07%, while USNQX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.98% annualized return.


USGRX

1D
0.86%
1M
0.54%
6M
9.08%
YTD
11.67%
1Y
22.77%
3Y*
18.40%
5Y*
11.58%
10Y*
13.07%
ALL TIME*
9.26%

USNQX

1D
3.39%
1M
-4.21%
6M
10.11%
YTD
11.42%
1Y
23.71%
3Y*
21.71%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*
19.98%
ALL TIME*
9.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

USGRX vs. USNQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USGRX
USAA Growth & Income Fund
11.67%15.94%21.47%26.69%-18.52%22.53%17.45%21.78%-8.76%20.67%
USNQX
USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund
11.42%20.52%25.42%54.46%-32.71%26.82%48.31%38.86%-0.43%32.30%

Correlation

The correlation between USGRX and USNQX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2000

0.87

The correlation between USGRX and USNQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USGRX vs. USNQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USGRX
USGRX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
USGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
USGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
USGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
USGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

USNQX
USNQX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
USNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
USNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
USNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
USNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USGRX vs. USNQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Growth & Income Fund (USGRX) and USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USGRXUSNQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.19

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

1.72

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.19

5.53

+6.66

USGRX vs. USNQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the USNQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USGRX and USNQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USGRX vs. USNQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USGRX drawdown since its inception was -56.93%, smaller than the maximum USNQX drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USGRX and USNQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USGRXUSNQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.93%

-76.24%

+19.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-12.07%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.29%

-22.88%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.81%

-36.95%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.48%

-36.95%

+2.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-8.32%

+7.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.67%

-26.61%

+17.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

3.75%

-2.05%

Volatility

USGRX vs. USNQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Growth & Income Fund (USGRX) is 2.57%, while USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund (USNQX) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that USGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USNQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USGRXUSNQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

6.91%

-4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.85%

16.01%

-8.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.54%

19.39%

-8.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.86%

23.39%

-2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.99%

22.86%

-2.87%

USGRX vs. USNQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USGRX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than USNQX's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

USGRX vs. USNQX - Dividend Comparison

USGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, more than USNQX's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USGRX
USAA Growth & Income Fund
7.43%8.06%20.65%0.93%12.58%11.97%0.84%24.69%11.92%5.12%1.26%6.45%
USNQX
USAA Nasdaq 100 Index Fund
2.71%3.01%2.19%2.60%4.13%4.48%1.53%0.88%0.69%1.97%0.50%2.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


USGRX and USNQX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USNQX has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to USGRX (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USGRX dropped -56.93% vs USNQX's -76.24%.

USGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USGRX and USNQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer