PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USGRX vs. FFNOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USGRX vs. FFNOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Growth & Income Fund (USGRX) and Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund (FFNOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USGRX achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly lower than FFNOX's 11.15% return. Over the past 10 years, USGRX has outperformed FFNOX with an annualized return of 13.59%, while FFNOX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.60% annualized return.


USGRX

1D
0.07%
1M
1.05%
YTD
9.48%
6M
8.45%
1Y
23.46%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
11.89%
10Y*
13.59%

FFNOX

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.88%
YTD
11.15%
6M
10.54%
1Y
24.98%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
11.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USGRX vs. FFNOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USGRX
USAA Growth & Income Fund
9.48%15.94%21.47%26.69%-18.52%22.53%17.45%21.78%-8.76%20.67%
FFNOX
Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund
11.15%20.18%13.05%19.29%-18.02%17.05%16.30%25.09%-6.58%17.09%

Correlation

The correlation between USGRX and FFNOX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 1999

0.95

The correlation between USGRX and FFNOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USGRX vs. FFNOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USGRX
USGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
USGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
USGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
USGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
USGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FFNOX
FFNOX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FFNOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFNOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFNOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FFNOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFNOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USGRX vs. FFNOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Growth & Income Fund (USGRX) and Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund (FFNOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USGRXFFNOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.41

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

3.02

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.54

12.91

+1.63

USGRX vs. FFNOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USGRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the FFNOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USGRX and FFNOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USGRX vs. FFNOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USGRX drawdown since its inception was -56.93%, which is greater than FFNOX's maximum drawdown of -49.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USGRX and FFNOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USGRXFFNOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.93%

-49.84%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.47%

-8.60%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.29%

-14.10%

-15.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.81%

-26.04%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.48%

-29.93%

-4.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-0.38%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.70%

-8.68%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

2.01%

-0.31%

Volatility

USGRX vs. FFNOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Growth & Income Fund (USGRX) is 3.58%, while Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund (FFNOX) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that USGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFNOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USGRXFFNOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

4.69%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.87%

9.85%

-1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.50%

11.87%

-1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.89%

13.88%

+7.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.11%

14.62%

+5.49%

USGRX vs. FFNOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USGRX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FFNOX's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

USGRX vs. FFNOX - Dividend Comparison

USGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, more than FFNOX's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFNOX
Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund
2.31%3.68%6.43%3.18%7.14%5.71%2.87%2.96%2.90%0.64%2.50%0.70%
USGRX
USAA Growth & Income Fund
7.57%8.06%20.65%0.93%12.58%11.97%0.84%24.69%11.92%5.12%1.26%6.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, USGRX and FFNOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFNOX has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to USGRX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USGRX dropped -56.93% vs FFNOX's -49.84%.

USGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USGRX and FFNOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer