PortfoliosLab logo
MUHLX vs. FMILX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MUHLX and FMILX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

MUHLX vs. FMILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) and Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MUHLX:

0.46

FMILX:

0.58

Sortino Ratio

MUHLX:

0.88

FMILX:

0.91

Omega Ratio

MUHLX:

1.12

FMILX:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

MUHLX:

0.71

FMILX:

0.59

Martin Ratio

MUHLX:

2.25

FMILX:

2.02

Ulcer Index

MUHLX:

4.01%

FMILX:

5.92%

Daily Std Dev

MUHLX:

16.25%

FMILX:

21.29%

Max Drawdown

MUHLX:

-62.05%

FMILX:

-56.03%

Current Drawdown

MUHLX:

-2.49%

FMILX:

-3.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUHLX achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly higher than FMILX's 1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, MUHLX has underperformed FMILX with an annualized return of 7.37%, while FMILX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.35% annualized return.


MUHLX

YTD

5.59%

1M

2.33%

6M

-2.08%

1Y

7.39%

3Y*

9.27%

5Y*

16.74%

10Y*

7.37%

FMILX

YTD

1.55%

1M

5.40%

6M

-1.03%

1Y

12.35%

3Y*

17.34%

5Y*

19.21%

10Y*

12.35%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Muhlenkamp Fund

Fidelity New Millennium Fund

MUHLX vs. FMILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUHLX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FMILX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MUHLX vs. FMILX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUHLX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MUHLX is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MUHLX is 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MUHLX is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MUHLX is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MUHLX is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MUHLX is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FMILX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FMILX is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FMILX is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FMILX is 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FMILX is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FMILX is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FMILX is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MUHLX vs. FMILX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) and Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MUHLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is comparable to the FMILX Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUHLX and FMILX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MUHLX vs. FMILX - Dividend Comparison

MUHLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than FMILX's 3.58% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MUHLX
Muhlenkamp Fund
7.49%7.91%0.89%6.80%7.77%10.28%1.26%14.70%4.30%0.00%11.02%15.21%
FMILX
Fidelity New Millennium Fund
3.58%3.64%3.87%4.19%8.25%8.60%4.72%18.25%8.73%6.65%11.99%8.67%

Drawdowns

MUHLX vs. FMILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUHLX drawdown since its inception was -62.05%, which is greater than FMILX's maximum drawdown of -56.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUHLX and FMILX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MUHLX vs. FMILX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) is 2.97%, while Fidelity New Millennium Fund (FMILX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that MUHLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...