MUHLX vs. FSKAX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MUHLX (Muhlenkamp Fund) and FSKAX (Fidelity Total Market Index Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MUHLX returned 10.71%/yr vs 15.07%/yr for FSKAX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MUHLX charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FSKAX.

Performance

MUHLX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUHLX achieves a 10.81% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's 11.81% return. Over the past 10 years, MUHLX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 10.71%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.07% annualized return.

MUHLX

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -2.09%
• YTD: 10.81%
• 6M: 12.12%
• 1Y: 23.64%
• 3Y*: 13.67%
• 5Y*: 10.58%
• 10Y*: 10.71%

FSKAX

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 5.13%
• YTD: 11.81%
• 6M: 12.19%
• 1Y: 29.70%
• 3Y*: 22.32%
• 5Y*: 12.92%
• 10Y*: 15.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUHLX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund	10.81%	17.82%	3.38%	13.92%	2.89%	28.98%	11.96%	14.39%	-13.29%	18.78%
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund	11.81%	17.06%	23.89%	26.12%	-19.53%	25.66%	20.79%	30.92%	-5.32%	20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between MUHLX and FSKAX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011	0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between MUHLX and FSKAX has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MUHLX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUHLX

MUHLX Risk / Return Rank: 37
MUHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
MUHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
MUHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
MUHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MUHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

FSKAX

FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUHLX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MUHLX	FSKAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	2.48	-0.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	3.36	-0.93
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.44	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	3.38	-0.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.15	15.57	-6.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MUHLX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUHLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUHLX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MUHLX	FSKAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	2.48	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	0.75	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.82	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.85	-0.34

Drawdowns

MUHLX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUHLX drawdown since its inception was -62.05%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUHLX and FSKAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUHLX	FSKAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.05%	-35.01%	-27.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.23%	-8.92%	-1.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.63%	-19.43%	+0.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.63%	-25.39%	+6.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.85%	-35.01%	-5.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.18%	0.00%	-4.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.77%	-4.02%	-6.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	1.94%	+0.74%

Volatility

MUHLX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) have volatilities of 3.09% and 2.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MUHLX	FSKAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.09%	2.97%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.95%	9.24%	+1.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.00%	12.28%	+1.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.62%	17.41%	-2.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.05%	18.46%	-1.41%

MUHLX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUHLX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

MUHLX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

MUHLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than FSKAX's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund	0.93%	1.01%	1.19%	1.41%	1.62%	1.15%	1.45%	1.94%	2.54%	2.07%	2.43%	0.82%
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund	3.01%	3.34%	0.58%	0.89%	6.80%	7.77%	10.28%	1.26%	14.70%	4.30%	0.00%	11.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUHLX and FSKAX in my portfolio?

MUHLX and FSKAX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MUHLX or FSKAX?

MUHLX has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to FSKAX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUHLX dropped -62.05% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSKAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.