PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USAGX vs. USCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USAGX vs. USCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and USAA Capital Growth Fund (USCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USAGX achieves a -13.41% return, which is significantly lower than USCGX's 11.53% return. Over the past 10 years, USAGX has underperformed USCGX with an annualized return of 9.33%, while USCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.80% annualized return.


USAGX

1D
-3.41%
1M
-4.69%
6M
-20.65%
YTD
-13.41%
1Y
42.45%
3Y*
36.10%
5Y*
16.73%
10Y*
9.33%
ALL TIME*
5.56%

USCGX

1D
0.07%
1M
0.98%
6M
7.03%
YTD
11.53%
1Y
24.86%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
11.41%
10Y*
11.80%
ALL TIME*
5.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

USAGX vs. USCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USAGX
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund
-13.41%156.06%10.76%6.73%-11.80%-10.14%25.85%42.97%-12.26%9.65%
USCGX
USAA Capital Growth Fund
11.53%21.76%16.31%18.39%-13.44%22.94%10.04%20.13%-11.53%23.88%

Correlation

The correlation between USAGX and USCGX is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2000

0.29

Over the past year, USAGX and USCGX have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USAGX vs. USCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

USAGX
USAGX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
USAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
USAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
USAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
USAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

USCGX
USCGX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
USCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
USCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

USAGX vs. USCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and USAA Capital Growth Fund (USCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USAGXUSCGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.32

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

2.43

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.60

10.47

-7.87

USAGX vs. USCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the USCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USAGX and USCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USAGX vs. USCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USAGX drawdown since its inception was -80.89%, which is greater than USCGX's maximum drawdown of -63.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAGX and USCGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USAGXUSCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.89%

-63.08%

-17.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.32%

-9.80%

-28.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.32%

-22.06%

-16.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.72%

-29.47%

-16.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.03%

-35.32%

-15.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.20%

0.00%

-35.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.03%

-18.37%

-24.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.58%

2.27%

+15.31%

Volatility

USAGX vs. USCGX - Volatility Comparison

USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) has a higher volatility of 12.08% compared to USAA Capital Growth Fund (USCGX) at 3.70%. This indicates that USAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USAGXUSCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.08%

3.70%

+8.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.91%

11.12%

+26.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.69%

13.37%

+32.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.72%

18.00%

+15.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.94%

17.99%

+14.95%

USAGX vs. USCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USAGX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than USCGX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

USAGX vs. USCGX - Dividend Comparison

USAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than USCGX's 9.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USAGX
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund
0.28%0.24%0.00%2.45%0.95%0.84%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.20%0.00%
USCGX
USAA Capital Growth Fund
9.76%10.89%12.63%1.08%7.69%12.56%3.08%9.18%9.40%3.22%1.46%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


USAGX and USCGX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USAGX has higher volatility (12.08%) compared to USCGX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USAGX dropped -80.89% vs USCGX's -63.08%.

USCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USAGX and USCGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer