PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USAGX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USAGX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USAGX achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, USAGX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 13.09%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


USAGX

1D
-3.28%
1M
-1.24%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
5.19%
1Y
57.84%
3Y*
40.08%
5Y*
17.07%
10Y*
13.09%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USAGX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USAGX
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund
-0.58%156.06%10.76%6.73%-11.80%-10.14%25.85%42.97%-12.26%9.65%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between USAGX and VOO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.21

The correlation between USAGX and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (10 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USAGX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USAGX
USAGX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
USAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
USAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
USAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
USAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USAGX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USAGXVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.56

2.53

-0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

3.43

-1.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.46

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

3.42

-1.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.83

15.95

-10.11

USAGX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USAGX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USAGXVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

2.53

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.85

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.87

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.89

-0.70

Drawdowns

USAGX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USAGX drawdown since its inception was -80.89%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAGX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USAGXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.89%

-33.99%

-46.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.12%

-8.90%

-21.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.12%

-18.69%

-11.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.72%

-24.52%

-21.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.03%

-33.99%

-17.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.60%

0.00%

-25.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.08%

-3.69%

-39.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.50%

1.91%

+9.59%

Volatility

USAGX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) has a higher volatility of 14.19% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that USAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USAGXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.19%

2.74%

+11.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.25%

8.88%

+26.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.02%

11.78%

+31.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.86%

16.81%

+16.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.81%

18.01%

+14.80%

USAGX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

USAGX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

USAGX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

USAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USAGX
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund
0.24%0.24%0.00%2.45%0.95%0.84%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.20%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


USAGX and VOO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USAGX has higher volatility (14.19%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USAGX dropped -80.89% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USAGX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer