USCGX vs. VTI
Compare and contrast key facts about USAA Capital Growth Fund (USCGX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI).
USCGX is managed by Victory Capital. It was launched on Oct 26, 2000. VTI is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Total Market Index. It was launched on May 24, 2001.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: USCGX or VTI.
Key characteristics
| USCGX | VTI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.16% | 17.92% |
| 1Y Return | 25.60% | 27.57% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.32% | 8.32% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.71% | 14.45% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.19% | 12.32% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.03 | 2.00 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.04% | 13.02% |
| Max Drawdown | -60.52% | -55.45% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.77% | -0.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between USCGX and VTI is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
USCGX vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with USCGX having a 17.16% return and VTI slightly higher at 17.92%. Over the past 10 years, USCGX has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 9.19%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.32% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USCGX vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
USCGX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
USCGX vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Capital Growth Fund (USCGX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
USCGX vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
USCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than VTI's 1.32% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USCGX USAA Capital Growth Fund | 0.92% | 1.08% | 7.69% | 12.56% | 3.08% | 9.18% | 9.40% | 3.22% | 1.46% | 1.13% | 1.54% | 1.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.74% |
Drawdowns
USCGX vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USCGX drawdown since its inception was -60.52%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCGX and VTI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
USCGX vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for USAA Capital Growth Fund (USCGX) is 3.67%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that USCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.