PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCGX vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USCGX vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Capital Growth Fund (USCGX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCGX achieves a 10.37% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 12.01% return. Over the past 10 years, USCGX has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 11.88%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.13% annualized return.


USCGX

1D
0.26%
1M
3.12%
YTD
10.37%
6M
12.08%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
20.48%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
11.88%

VTI

1D
0.26%
1M
5.37%
YTD
12.01%
6M
12.40%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
15.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCGX vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USCGX
USAA Capital Growth Fund
10.37%21.76%16.31%18.39%-13.44%22.94%10.04%20.13%-11.53%23.88%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
12.01%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between USCGX and VTI is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2001

0.90

The correlation between USCGX and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USCGX vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCGX
USCGX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
USCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
USCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCGX vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Capital Growth Fund (USCGX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USCGXVTIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

2.48

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.16

3.37

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.45

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

3.44

-0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.42

15.88

-3.46

USCGX vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCGX and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USCGXVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.48

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.75

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.83

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.51

-0.23

Drawdowns

USCGX vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCGX drawdown since its inception was -63.08%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCGX and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USCGXVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.08%

-55.45%

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

-8.92%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.06%

-19.30%

-2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.47%

-25.36%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.32%

-35.00%

-0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.49%

-8.03%

-10.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

1.93%

+0.31%

Volatility

USCGX vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

USAA Capital Growth Fund (USCGX) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.86%. This indicates that USCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USCGXVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

2.86%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

9.11%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.42%

12.15%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.90%

17.40%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

18.30%

-0.27%

USCGX vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCGX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

USCGX vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

USCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.87%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USCGX
USAA Capital Growth Fund
9.87%10.89%12.63%1.08%7.69%12.56%3.08%9.18%9.40%3.22%1.46%1.13%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, USCGX and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

USCGX has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to VTI (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCGX dropped -63.08% vs VTI's -55.45%.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCGX and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer