PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USAGX vs. FSPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USAGX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USAGX achieves a -4.07% return, which is significantly lower than FSPSX's 10.54% return. Over the past 10 years, USAGX has outperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 12.34%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.67% annualized return.


USAGX

1D
-2.39%
1M
-2.37%
YTD
-4.07%
6M
-8.16%
1Y
55.73%
3Y*
39.04%
5Y*
19.55%
10Y*
12.34%

FSPSX

1D
0.76%
1M
1.93%
YTD
10.54%
6M
11.05%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
9.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USAGX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USAGX
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund
-4.07%156.06%10.76%6.73%-11.80%-10.14%25.85%42.97%-12.26%9.65%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
10.54%31.98%3.70%18.31%-14.23%11.45%8.16%22.03%-13.55%25.37%

Correlation

The correlation between USAGX and FSPSX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2011

0.33

The correlation between USAGX and FSPSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.50 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USAGX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USAGX
USAGX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
USAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
USAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
USAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
USAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPSX
FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USAGX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


USAGXFSPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.29

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

2.15

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.11

8.05

-3.94

USAGX vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USAGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USAGX and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

USAGX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USAGX drawdown since its inception was -80.89%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAGX and FSPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USAGXFSPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.89%

-33.69%

-47.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.13%

-11.39%

-24.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.13%

-13.58%

-22.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.72%

-29.41%

-16.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.03%

-33.69%

-17.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.21%

0.00%

-28.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.06%

-6.53%

-36.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.17%

3.04%

+10.13%

Volatility

USAGX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) has a higher volatility of 16.34% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 4.93%. This indicates that USAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USAGXFSPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.34%

4.93%

+11.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.68%

12.71%

+24.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.55%

15.26%

+29.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.30%

16.07%

+17.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.91%

16.56%

+16.35%

USAGX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USAGX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

USAGX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

USAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than FSPSX's 2.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
2.85%3.15%3.27%2.79%2.66%3.07%1.84%3.18%2.79%2.50%3.08%2.79%
USAGX
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund
0.25%0.24%0.00%2.45%0.95%0.84%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.20%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USAGX and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USAGX has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to FSPSX (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USAGX dropped -80.89% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

FSPSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USAGX and FSPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer