USCGX vs. CIAOX
Compare and contrast key facts about USAA Capital Growth Fund (USCGX) and Capital Advisors Growth Fund (CIAOX).
USCGX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Oct 26, 2000. CIAOX is managed by Capital Advisors. It was launched on Dec 31, 1999.
Performance
USCGX vs. CIAOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USCGX vs. CIAOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USCGX USAA Capital Growth Fund | -1.09% | 21.76% | 16.31% | 18.39% | -13.44% | 22.94% | 10.04% | 20.13% | -11.53% | 23.88% |
CIAOX Capital Advisors Growth Fund | -6.30% | 16.47% | 23.36% | 24.35% | -18.96% | 21.70% | 29.05% | 39.88% | -4.80% | 14.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USCGX achieves a -1.09% return, which is significantly higher than CIAOX's -6.30% return. Over the past 10 years, USCGX has underperformed CIAOX with an annualized return of 10.84%, while CIAOX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.38% annualized return.
USCGX
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- YTD
- -1.09%
- 6M
- 2.48%
- 1Y
- 21.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.55%
- 5Y*
- 10.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.84%
CIAOX
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- -6.25%
- YTD
- -6.30%
- 6M
- -4.54%
- 1Y
- 13.79%
- 3Y*
- 16.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USCGX vs. CIAOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USCGX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than CIAOX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
USCGX vs. CIAOX — Risk / Return Rank
USCGX
CIAOX
USCGX vs. CIAOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Capital Growth Fund (USCGX) and Capital Advisors Growth Fund (CIAOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USCGX | CIAOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 0.78 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.92 | 1.22 | +0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.18 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 1.24 | +0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.50 | 4.66 | +3.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USCGX | CIAOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 0.78 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.56 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.78 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.30 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between USCGX and CIAOX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
USCGX vs. CIAOX - Dividend Comparison
USCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.01%, more than CIAOX's 4.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USCGX USAA Capital Growth Fund | 11.01% | 10.89% | 12.63% | 1.08% | 7.69% | 12.56% | 3.08% | 9.18% | 9.40% | 3.22% | 1.46% | 1.13% |
CIAOX Capital Advisors Growth Fund | 4.59% | 4.30% | 8.00% | 0.42% | 1.09% | 10.43% | 6.36% | 7.31% | 6.80% | 7.93% | 0.66% | 6.45% |
Drawdowns
USCGX vs. CIAOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USCGX drawdown since its inception was -63.08%, smaller than the maximum CIAOX drawdown of -66.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCGX and CIAOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USCGX | CIAOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.08% | -66.49% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.38% | -11.74% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.47% | -24.22% | -5.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.32% | -28.96% | -6.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.15% | -9.17% | +2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.60% | -22.10% | +3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 3.13% | -0.59% |
Volatility
USCGX vs. CIAOX - Volatility Comparison
USAA Capital Growth Fund (USCGX) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to Capital Advisors Growth Fund (CIAOX) at 5.61%. This indicates that USCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIAOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USCGX | CIAOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 5.61% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.68% | 10.45% | -0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.34% | 18.51% | -2.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 16.82% | +1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 17.26% | +0.73% |