USAGX vs. CEF
Compare and contrast key facts about USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF).
USAGX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Aug 14, 1984. CEF is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Jan 16, 2018.
Performance
USAGX vs. CEF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USAGX vs. CEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USAGX USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund | -0.46% | 156.06% | 10.76% | 6.73% | -11.80% | -10.14% | 25.85% | 42.97% | -12.26% | 9.65% |
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 4.19% | 92.76% | 24.07% | 6.80% | 1.07% | -8.32% | 31.99% | 16.91% | -6.34% | 18.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USAGX achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than CEF's 4.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with USAGX having a 15.64% annualized return and CEF not far behind at 15.03%.
USAGX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -25.50%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 13.74%
- 1Y
- 84.81%
- 3Y*
- 39.18%
- 5Y*
- 21.72%
- 10Y*
- 15.64%
CEF
- 1D
- 5.58%
- 1M
- -15.38%
- YTD
- 4.19%
- 6M
- 30.06%
- 1Y
- 67.97%
- 3Y*
- 36.15%
- 5Y*
- 21.95%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USAGX vs. CEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
USAGX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than CEF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
USAGX vs. CEF — Risk / Return Rank
USAGX
CEF
USAGX vs. CEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USAGX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.03 | 1.83 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.30 | 2.12 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 2.61 | +0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.78 | 9.68 | +1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USAGX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 1.83 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.93 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.70 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.23 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between USAGX and CEF is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
USAGX vs. CEF - Dividend Comparison
USAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, while CEF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USAGX USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 2.45% | 0.95% | 0.84% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.20% | 0.00% |
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.10% |
Drawdowns
USAGX vs. CEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USAGX drawdown since its inception was -80.89%, which is greater than CEF's maximum drawdown of -62.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAGX and CEF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USAGX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.89% | -62.29% | -18.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.12% | -26.77% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.72% | -26.77% | -18.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.03% | -29.10% | -21.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.50% | -19.41% | -6.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.17% | -27.38% | -15.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.09% | 7.23% | +0.86% |
Volatility
USAGX vs. CEF - Volatility Comparison
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) have volatilities of 15.38% and 14.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USAGX | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.38% | 14.73% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.05% | 35.36% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.75% | 37.38% | +5.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.06% | 23.78% | +8.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.73% | 21.58% | +11.15% |