CEF vs. PSLV
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV).
CEF is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Jan 16, 2018.
Performance
CEF vs. PSLV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEF vs. PSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 4.19% | 92.76% | 24.07% | 6.80% | 1.07% | -8.32% | 31.99% | 16.91% | -6.34% | 18.78% |
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust | 3.13% | 145.08% | 19.43% | -1.94% | 2.74% | -14.13% | 42.81% | 16.99% | -11.83% | 4.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEF achieves a 4.19% return, which is significantly higher than PSLV's 3.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CEF having a 15.03% annualized return and PSLV not far behind at 14.87%.
CEF
- 1D
- 5.58%
- 1M
- -15.38%
- YTD
- 4.19%
- 6M
- 30.06%
- 1Y
- 67.97%
- 3Y*
- 36.15%
- 5Y*
- 21.95%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
PSLV
- 1D
- 7.49%
- 1M
- -21.04%
- YTD
- 3.13%
- 6M
- 55.35%
- 1Y
- 110.26%
- 3Y*
- 43.00%
- 5Y*
- 22.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEF vs. PSLV — Risk / Return Rank
CEF
PSLV
CEF vs. PSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEF | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 1.96 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.12 | 2.11 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.37 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 2.72 | -0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.68 | 8.74 | +0.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEF | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 1.96 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.64 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.49 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.19 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEF and PSLV is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CEF vs. PSLV - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEF nor PSLV has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.10% |
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CEF vs. PSLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEF drawdown since its inception was -62.29%, smaller than the maximum PSLV drawdown of -79.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEF and PSLV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEF | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.29% | -79.38% | +17.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.77% | -40.65% | +13.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.77% | -40.65% | +13.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.10% | -42.79% | +13.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.41% | -32.92% | +13.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.38% | -58.45% | +31.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.23% | 12.66% | -5.43% |
Volatility
CEF vs. PSLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) is 14.73%, while Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) has a volatility of 19.87%. This indicates that CEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEF | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.73% | 19.87% | -5.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.36% | 56.42% | -21.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.38% | 56.50% | -19.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 34.63% | -10.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 30.69% | -9.11% |