CEF vs. PICK
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) and iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK).
CEF is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Jan 16, 2018. PICK is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012.
Performance
CEF vs. PICK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEF vs. PICK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 4.19% | 92.76% | 24.07% | 6.80% | 1.07% | -8.32% | 31.99% | 16.91% | -6.34% | 18.78% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 10.23% | 51.89% | -16.37% | 9.69% | 2.54% | 22.61% | 27.46% | 16.47% | -18.65% | 38.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEF achieves a 4.19% return, which is significantly lower than PICK's 10.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CEF has underperformed PICK with an annualized return of 15.03%, while PICK has yielded a comparatively higher 15.98% annualized return.
CEF
- 1D
- 5.58%
- 1M
- -15.38%
- YTD
- 4.19%
- 6M
- 30.06%
- 1Y
- 67.97%
- 3Y*
- 36.15%
- 5Y*
- 21.95%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
PICK
- 1D
- 4.93%
- 1M
- -12.05%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 6M
- 29.18%
- 1Y
- 63.27%
- 3Y*
- 13.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEF vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEF vs. PICK — Risk / Return Rank
CEF
PICK
CEF vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) and iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEF | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 2.18 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.12 | 2.68 | -0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.40 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 3.12 | -0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.68 | 12.51 | -2.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEF | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.18 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.40 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.56 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.17 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEF and PICK is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CEF vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison
CEF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.10% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 2.61% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 4.19% | 6.93% | 5.89% | 2.27% | 5.51% | 4.77% | 2.41% | 1.15% | 15.77% |
Drawdowns
CEF vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEF drawdown since its inception was -62.29%, smaller than the maximum PICK drawdown of -68.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEF and PICK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEF | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.29% | -68.87% | +6.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.77% | -19.54% | -7.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.77% | -36.37% | +9.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.10% | -52.72% | +23.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.41% | -12.15% | -7.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.38% | -24.37% | -3.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.23% | 4.87% | +2.36% |
Volatility
CEF vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) has a higher volatility of 14.73% compared to iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) at 13.01%. This indicates that CEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEF | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.73% | 13.01% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.36% | 21.97% | +13.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.38% | 29.27% | +8.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 27.51% | -3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 28.47% | -6.89% |