CEF vs. TYG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CEF (Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust) and TYG (Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund) are both mutual funds - CEF is a Precious Metals fund actively managed by Sprott, while TYG is a MLPs fund actively managed by Tortoise. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, CEF returned 13.80%/yr vs -1.19%/yr for TYG. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CEF charges 0.48%/yr vs 2.90%/yr for TYG.

Performance

CEF vs. TYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CEF achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than TYG's 12.81% return. Over the past 10 years, CEF has outperformed TYG with an annualized return of 13.80%, while TYG has yielded a comparatively lower -1.19% annualized return.

CEF

• 1D: -1.74%
• 1M: -0.92%
• YTD: 1.16%
• 6M: 10.23%
• 1Y: 54.90%
• 3Y*: 35.48%
• 5Y*: 18.30%
• 10Y*: 13.80%

TYG

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: -11.67%
• YTD: 12.81%
• 6M: 7.85%
• 1Y: 18.81%
• 3Y*: 28.24%
• 5Y*: 19.47%
• 10Y*: -1.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CEF vs. TYG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust	1.16%	92.76%	24.07%	6.80%	1.07%	-8.32%	31.99%	16.91%	-6.34%	18.78%
TYG Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund	12.81%	8.46%	60.18%	-0.37%	24.20%	46.86%	-70.31%	1.79%	-24.74%	3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CEF and TYG is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2004	0.13

The correlation between CEF and TYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CEF vs. TYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CEF

CEF Risk / Return Rank: 25
CEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
CEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
CEF Omega Ratio Rank: 29
CEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
CEF Martin Ratio Rank: 20

TYG

TYG Risk / Return Rank: 15
TYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
TYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
TYG Omega Ratio Rank: 14
TYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
TYG Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CEF vs. TYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CEF	TYG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	0.97	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.79	1.37	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.19	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	1.62	+0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.26	5.20	+0.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CEF vs. TYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the TYG Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEF and TYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CEF	TYG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	0.97	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.81	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	-0.02	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.09	+0.13

Drawdowns

CEF vs. TYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CEF drawdown since its inception was -62.29%, smaller than the maximum TYG drawdown of -95.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEF and TYG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CEF	TYG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.29%	-95.34%	+33.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.77%	-11.67%	-15.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.77%	-25.08%	-1.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.77%	-25.08%	-1.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.10%	-94.98%	+65.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.75%	-35.65%	+13.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.34%	-29.42%	+2.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.47%	3.63%	+6.84%

Volatility

CEF vs. TYG - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) has a higher volatility of 10.09% compared to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) at 7.20%. This indicates that CEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CEF	TYG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.09%	7.20%	+2.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.14%	17.34%	+17.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.84%	19.45%	+18.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.26%	24.06%	+0.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.82%	51.16%	-29.34%

CEF vs. TYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CEF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than TYG's 2.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

CEF vs. TYG - Dividend Comparison

CEF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.95%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.07%	0.09%	0.10%
TYG Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund	12.95%	11.25%	7.96%	9.87%	8.94%	5.27%	10.85%	14.61%	13.17%	9.01%	8.54%	13.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CEF and TYG in my portfolio?

CEF and TYG have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CEF or TYG?

CEF has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to TYG (7.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CEF dropped -62.29% vs TYG's -95.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.