PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URTY vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URTY vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URTY achieves a 56.97% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 6.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with URTY having a 9.56% annualized return and NOBL not far ahead at 9.97%.


URTY

1D
-2.91%
1M
9.67%
YTD
56.97%
6M
45.90%
1Y
125.23%
3Y*
31.82%
5Y*
-6.44%
10Y*
9.56%

NOBL

1D
0.68%
1M
2.27%
YTD
6.48%
6M
5.98%
1Y
12.52%
3Y*
8.50%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*
9.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URTY vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URTY
ProShares UltraPro Russell2000
56.97%9.26%7.38%24.43%-62.81%28.47%-7.72%72.37%-39.59%38.85%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
6.48%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between URTY and NOBL is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013

0.75

The correlation between URTY and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

URTY vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
URTY
NOBL

Technology

19.1%
4.6%

Industrials

17.8%
20.2%

Healthcare

16.3%
10.2%

Financial Services

15.5%
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
5.3%

Real Estate

5.9%
4.6%

Energy

5.4%
2.9%

Basic Materials

4.7%
10.2%

Utilities

2.7%
5.7%

Communication Services

2.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
23.6%

Technology

URTY
19.1%
NOBL
4.6%

Industrials

URTY
17.8%
NOBL
20.2%

Healthcare

URTY
16.3%
NOBL
10.2%

Financial Services

URTY
15.5%
NOBL
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

URTY
7.9%
NOBL
5.3%

Real Estate

URTY
5.9%
NOBL
4.6%

Energy

URTY
5.4%
NOBL
2.9%

Basic Materials

URTY
4.7%
NOBL
10.2%

Utilities

URTY
2.7%
NOBL
5.7%

Communication Services

URTY
2.5%
NOBL

-

Consumer Defensive

URTY
2.2%
NOBL
23.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URTY vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URTY
URTY Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
URTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTY Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
URTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URTY vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URTYNOBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.19

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

1.38

+2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.67

3.50

+9.17

URTY vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URTY Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URTY and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URTY vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URTY drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTY and NOBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URTYNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.09%

-35.43%

-52.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.56%

-9.11%

-23.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.85%

-15.36%

-50.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.76%

-17.92%

-64.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.09%

-35.43%

-52.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.38%

-3.29%

-32.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.79%

-3.48%

-31.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.92%

3.58%

+6.34%

Volatility

URTY vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) has a higher volatility of 19.76% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.31%. This indicates that URTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URTYNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.76%

3.31%

+16.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.77%

8.22%

+34.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.97%

11.52%

+47.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.67%

14.38%

+53.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.41%

16.60%

+52.81%

URTY vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

URTY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

URTY vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

URTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than NOBL's 2.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.06%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%
URTY
ProShares UltraPro Russell2000
0.60%1.02%1.16%0.55%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.18%0.28%0.00%0.03%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


URTY and NOBL have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URTY has higher volatility (19.76%) compared to NOBL (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URTY dropped -88.09% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 9.97% vs 9.56% for URTY. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 9.97% return vs 9.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URTY.

NOBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 0.60% for URTY.

URTY is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. URTY tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%), while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for URTY and 0.35% for NOBL.

URTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URTY and NOBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer