ULVM vs. JMOM
ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) and JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds - ULVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index while JMOM tracks the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ULVM returned 11.43%/yr vs 16.28%/yr for JMOM. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ULVM charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JMOM.
Performance
ULVM vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULVM achieves a 14.84% return, which is significantly lower than JMOM's 22.79% return.
ULVM
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 14.84%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- —
JMOM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 22.79%
- 6M
- 22.27%
- 1Y
- 36.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.37%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- —
ULVM vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 14.84% | 15.84% | 19.76% | 10.16% | -9.04% | 31.06% | 3.51% | 22.08% | -12.07% | 3.64% |
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 22.79% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULVM and JMOM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.80 |
The correlation between ULVM and JMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
ULVM vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ULVM
JMOM
Financial Services
Technology
Utilities
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
ULVM
JMOM
Technology
ULVM
JMOM
Utilities
ULVM
JMOM
Industrials
ULVM
JMOM
Healthcare
ULVM
JMOM
Real Estate
ULVM
JMOM
Consumer Cyclical
ULVM
JMOM
Consumer Defensive
ULVM
JMOM
Basic Materials
ULVM
JMOM
Communication Services
ULVM
JMOM
Energy
ULVM
JMOM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULVM vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank
ULVM
JMOM
ULVM vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ULVM | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.71 | 2.58 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.82 | 3.54 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.45 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.50 | 4.69 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.64 | 22.24 | -3.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ULVM | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 2.58 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.88 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.82 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
ULVM vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULVM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, which is greater than JMOM's maximum drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVM and JMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULVM | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.71% | -34.31% | -6.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -7.87% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | -19.51% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.77% | -28.26% | +8.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.17% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -6.32% | +0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 1.66% | -0.10% |
Volatility
ULVM vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) is 2.96%, while JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that ULVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULVM | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.96% | 4.62% | -1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.97% | 11.55% | -3.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 14.32% | -3.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 18.65% | -3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 20.13% | -1.27% |
ULVM vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ULVM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than JMOM's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ULVM vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison
ULVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than JMOM's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.71% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 1.58% | 1.81% | 1.57% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.88% | 1.67% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ULVM and JMOM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JMOM has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to ULVM (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULVM dropped -40.71% vs JMOM's -34.31%.
On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 16.28% vs 11.43% for ULVM. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 16.28% return vs 11.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ULVM.
ULVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.71% for JMOM.
ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index, while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ULVM and 0.12% for JMOM.
ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ULVM and JMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer