ULVM vs. SEIV
ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) and SEIV (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ULVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index, while SEIV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by SEI. ULVM is passively managed, while SEIV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ULVM returned 21.32%/yr vs 28.17%/yr for SEIV. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ULVM charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SEIV.
Performance
ULVM vs. SEIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULVM achieves a 14.99% return, which is significantly lower than SEIV's 19.29% return.
ULVM
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 14.99%
- 6M
- 15.51%
- 1Y
- 29.88%
- 3Y*
- 21.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- —
SEIV
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 11.33%
- YTD
- 19.29%
- 6M
- 22.76%
- 1Y
- 47.08%
- 3Y*
- 28.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ULVM vs. SEIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 14.99% | 15.84% | 19.76% | 10.16% | 2.06% |
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF | 19.29% | 27.43% | 19.73% | 21.90% | -3.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULVM and SEIV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022 | 0.91 |
The correlation between ULVM and SEIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
ULVM vs. SEIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ULVM
SEIV
Financial Services
Technology
Utilities
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
ULVM
SEIV
Technology
ULVM
SEIV
Utilities
ULVM
SEIV
Industrials
ULVM
SEIV
Healthcare
ULVM
SEIV
Real Estate
ULVM
SEIV
Consumer Cyclical
ULVM
SEIV
Consumer Defensive
ULVM
SEIV
Basic Materials
ULVM
SEIV
Communication Services
ULVM
SEIV
Energy
ULVM
SEIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULVM vs. SEIV — Risk / Return Rank
ULVM
SEIV
ULVM vs. SEIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ULVM | SEIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.80 | 3.80 | -1.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.92 | 5.15 | -1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.68 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.64 | 6.79 | -2.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.27 | 27.78 | -8.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ULVM | SEIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 3.80 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.25 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
ULVM vs. SEIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULVM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, which is greater than SEIV's maximum drawdown of -18.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVM and SEIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULVM | SEIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.71% | -18.18% | -22.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -6.95% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | -17.71% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -3.48% | -2.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 1.70% | -0.14% |
Volatility
ULVM vs. SEIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) is 3.13%, while SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that ULVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULVM | SEIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 3.94% | -0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.03% | 9.03% | -1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 12.45% | -1.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 16.68% | -1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 16.68% | +2.18% |
ULVM vs. SEIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ULVM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIV's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ULVM vs. SEIV - Dividend Comparison
ULVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than SEIV's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEIV SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF | 1.33% | 1.51% | 1.66% | 2.08% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 1.57% | 1.81% | 1.57% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.88% | 1.67% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ULVM and SEIV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEIV has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to ULVM (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULVM dropped -40.71% vs SEIV's -18.18%.
On 3-year performance, SEIV leads with 28.17% vs 21.32% for ULVM. On fees, SEIV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SEIV has performed better with a 28.17% return vs 21.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SEIV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ULVM.
ULVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.33% for SEIV.
ULVM is categorized as Momentum, while SEIV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ULVM and 0.15% for SEIV.
SEIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ULVM and SEIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer