ULVM vs. ONEV
Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares USAA MSCI USA Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV).
ULVM and ONEV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ULVM is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Select Value Momentum Blend Index. It was launched on Oct 24, 2017. ONEV is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR). It was launched on Dec 2, 2015. Both ULVM and ONEV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ULVM or ONEV.
Correlation
The correlation between ULVM and ONEV is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ULVM vs. ONEV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ULVM:
0.40
ONEV:
0.35
ULVM:
0.68
ONEV:
0.61
ULVM:
1.10
ONEV:
1.08
ULVM:
0.40
ONEV:
0.35
ULVM:
1.50
ONEV:
1.25
ULVM:
4.83%
ONEV:
4.15%
ULVM:
18.09%
ONEV:
14.71%
ULVM:
-40.71%
ONEV:
-39.72%
ULVM:
-10.65%
ONEV:
-8.68%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULVM achieves a -3.42% return, which is significantly lower than ONEV's -2.08% return.
ULVM
-3.42%
-2.67%
-3.62%
7.39%
14.64%
N/A
ONEV
-2.08%
-2.72%
-3.19%
5.61%
14.13%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ULVM vs. ONEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ULVM and ONEV have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ULVM vs. ONEV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ULVM
ONEV
ULVM vs. ONEV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares USAA MSCI USA Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ULVM vs. ONEV - Dividend Comparison
ULVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than ONEV's 1.97% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ULVM VictoryShares USAA MSCI USA Value Momentum ETF | 1.87% | 1.57% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.88% | 1.67% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF | 1.97% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.80% | 1.44% | 1.87% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 6.91% | 2.02% | 0.08% |
Drawdowns
ULVM vs. ONEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULVM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, roughly equal to the maximum ONEV drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVM and ONEV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ULVM vs. ONEV - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares USAA MSCI USA Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) has a higher volatility of 12.98% compared to SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) at 9.95%. This indicates that ULVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ONEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.