ULVM vs. JPUS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) and JPUS (JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ULVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index, while JPUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ULVM returned 11.59%/yr vs 9.51%/yr for JPUS. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ULVM charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for JPUS.

Performance

ULVM vs. JPUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULVM achieves a 14.99% return, which is significantly higher than JPUS's 11.51% return.

ULVM

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 2.92%
• YTD: 14.99%
• 6M: 15.51%
• 1Y: 29.88%
• 3Y*: 21.32%
• 5Y*: 11.59%
• 10Y*: —

JPUS

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 11.51%
• 6M: 11.90%
• 1Y: 21.48%
• 3Y*: 15.95%
• 5Y*: 9.51%
• 10Y*: 11.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULVM vs. JPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF	14.99%	15.84%	19.76%	10.16%	-9.04%	31.06%	3.51%	22.08%	-12.07%	4.30%
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF	11.51%	11.18%	13.48%	10.98%	-8.47%	29.09%	7.54%	25.50%	-6.14%	4.11%

Correlation

The correlation between ULVM and JPUS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017	0.96

The correlation between ULVM and JPUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

ULVM vs. JPUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ULVM	JPUS
Financial Services	22.5%	8.0%
Technology	13.1%	11.6%
Utilities	12.6%	9.5%
Industrials	12.2%	10.4%
Healthcare	10.1%	11.5%
Real Estate	8.7%	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	5.3%	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	11.3%
Basic Materials	4.1%	6.8%
Communication Services	3.5%	4.5%
Energy	3.4%	7.3%

Return for Risk

ULVM vs. JPUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULVM

ULVM Risk / Return Rank: 84
ULVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ULVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
ULVM Omega Ratio Rank: 81
ULVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ULVM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

JPUS

JPUS Risk / Return Rank: 62
JPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
JPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
JPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 58
JPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
JPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULVM vs. JPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ULVM	JPUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	2.07	+0.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	2.99	+0.93
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.36	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.64	3.13	+1.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.27	12.58	+6.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ULVM vs. JPUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is higher than the JPUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULVM and JPUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ULVM	JPUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.80	2.07	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.66	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.72	-0.14

Drawdowns

ULVM vs. JPUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULVM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, which is greater than JPUS's maximum drawdown of -38.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVM and JPUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ULVM	JPUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.71%	-38.69%	-2.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-6.90%	+0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.14%	-15.96%	-2.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.77%	-19.04%	-0.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.05%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.75%	-3.83%	-1.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	1.72%	-0.16%

Volatility

ULVM vs. JPUS - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF (JPUS) have volatilities of 3.13% and 2.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ULVM	JPUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.13%	2.99%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.03%	7.62%	+0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.74%	10.41%	+0.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.48%	14.50%	+0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.86%	16.76%	+2.10%

ULVM vs. JPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULVM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than JPUS's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ULVM vs. JPUS - Dividend Comparison

ULVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than JPUS's 2.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JPUS JPMorgan Diversified Return US Equity ETF	2.05%	2.27%	2.12%	2.26%	2.35%	1.67%	1.94%	2.09%	2.16%	1.25%	0.77%	0.48%
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF	1.57%	1.81%	1.57%	1.94%	1.91%	1.36%	1.51%	1.88%	1.67%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ULVM and JPUS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, ULVM and JPUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ULVM or JPUS?

ULVM has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to JPUS (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULVM dropped -40.71% vs JPUS's -38.69%.

Which ETF is better, ULVM or JPUS?

On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.59% vs 9.51% for JPUS. On fees, JPUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JPUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ULVM or JPUS?

Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.59% return vs 9.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ULVM or JPUS?

JPUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ULVM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ULVM or JPUS?

JPUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.57% for ULVM.

What is the main difference between ULVM and JPUS?

ULVM is categorized as Momentum, while JPUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index, while JPUS tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ULVM and 0.18% for JPUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.