ULVM vs. GFLW
ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) and GFLW (VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ULVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index, while GFLW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Victory Free Cash Flow Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ULVM returned 30.95% vs 21.44% for GFLW. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ULVM charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for GFLW.
Performance
ULVM vs. GFLW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ULVM achieves a 20.05% return, which is significantly higher than GFLW's 13.67% return.
ULVM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- 6M
- 15.22%
- YTD
- 20.05%
- 1Y
- 30.95%
- 3Y*
- 20.61%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.18%
GFLW
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -3.28%
- 6M
- 14.62%
- YTD
- 13.67%
- 1Y
- 21.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.20M | $5.66M | $3.52M | |
| $297.74K | $260.49K | $217.66K |
ULVM vs. GFLW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 20.05% | 15.84% | -6.42% |
GFLW VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | 13.67% | 18.40% | -5.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between ULVM and GFLW is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024 | 0.60 |
The correlation between ULVM and GFLW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ULVM vs. GFLW — Risk / Return Rank
ULVM
GFLW
ULVM vs. GFLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ULVM | GFLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.16 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.63 | 1.31 | +3.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.50 | 4.15 | +15.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ULVM vs. GFLW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ULVM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, which is greater than GFLW's maximum drawdown of -24.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULVM and GFLW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ULVM | GFLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.71% | -24.14% | -16.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.47% | -14.95% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.26% | -6.63% | +5.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -4.54% | -1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 4.72% | -3.19% |
Volatility
ULVM vs. GFLW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) is 2.72%, while VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that ULVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ULVM | GFLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | 5.87% | -3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.10% | 17.51% | -9.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.81% | 21.58% | -10.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 24.84% | -9.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 24.84% | -6.11% |
ULVM vs. GFLW - Expense Ratio Comparison
ULVM has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GFLW's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
ULVM vs. GFLW - Dividend Comparison
ULVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, while GFLW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFLW VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 1.62% | 1.81% | 1.57% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.88% | 1.67% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ULVM and GFLW have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFLW has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to ULVM (2.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULVM dropped -40.71% vs GFLW's -24.14%.
On 1-year performance, ULVM leads with 30.95% vs 21.44% for GFLW. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 30.95% return vs 21.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GFLW.
ULVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.00% for GFLW.
ULVM is categorized as Momentum, while GFLW is Large Cap Growth Equities. ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index, while GFLW tracks Victory Free Cash Flow Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ULVM and 0.39% for GFLW.
ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ULVM and GFLW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer