UL vs. WMB
UL (The Unilever Group) and WMB (The Williams Companies, Inc.) are both stocks. UL operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while WMB operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, UL returned 5.33%/yr vs 19.28%/yr for WMB. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UL vs. WMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UL achieves a -8.35% return, which is significantly lower than WMB's 21.67% return. Over the past 10 years, UL has underperformed WMB with an annualized return of 5.33%, while WMB has yielded a comparatively higher 19.28% annualized return.
UL
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- -8.35%
- 6M
- -7.70%
- 1Y
- -14.93%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- 0.66%
- 10Y*
- 5.33%
WMB
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- 21.67%
- 6M
- 22.42%
- 1Y
- 24.82%
- 3Y*
- 38.58%
- 5Y*
- 26.67%
- 10Y*
- 19.28%
UL vs. WMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UL The Unilever Group | -8.35% | 5.96% | 20.90% | -0.17% | -2.82% | -7.61% | 9.04% | 12.88% | -2.34% | 40.15% |
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 21.67% | 14.91% | 62.35% | 11.86% | 32.83% | 38.36% | -8.20% | 14.18% | -23.88% | 2.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between UL and WMB is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1988 | 0.22 |
The correlation between UL and WMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UL:
$129.35B
WMB:
$88.15B
UL:
€5.06
WMB:
$2.28
UL:
10.06
WMB:
31.55
UL:
1.97
WMB:
1.64
UL:
1.09
WMB:
7.39
UL:
7.20
WMB:
6.80
UL:
€109.27B
WMB:
$11.92B
UL:
€90.89B
WMB:
$7.49B
UL:
€24.12B
WMB:
$6.88B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UL vs. WMB — Risk / Return Rank
UL
WMB
UL vs. WMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Unilever Group (UL) and The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UL | WMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.20 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 2.02 | -2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 4.27 | -5.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UL vs. WMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UL drawdown since its inception was -53.55%, smaller than the maximum WMB drawdown of -98.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UL and WMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UL | WMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.55% | -98.03% | +44.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.09% | -12.36% | -12.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.09% | -12.36% | -12.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.53% | -23.01% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.13% | -68.08% | +37.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.64% | -8.55% | -11.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.61% | -27.07% | +16.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.20% | 5.82% | +6.38% |
Volatility
UL vs. WMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Unilever Group (UL) is 6.11%, while The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) has a volatility of 7.36%. This indicates that UL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UL | WMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 7.36% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.78% | 15.58% | +1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.50% | 23.00% | -1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 23.62% | -2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.61% | 30.95% | -9.34% |
Dividends
UL vs. WMB - Dividend Comparison
UL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than WMB's 3.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UL The Unilever Group | 3.87% | 3.51% | 3.29% | 3.83% | 3.57% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.80% | 3.42% | 3.02% |
WMB The Williams Companies, Inc. | 3.54% | 3.33% | 3.51% | 5.14% | 5.17% | 6.30% | 7.98% | 6.41% | 6.17% | 3.94% | 5.39% | 9.53% |
Financials
UL vs. WMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Unilever Group and The Williams Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UL vs. WMB - Profitability Comparison
UL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 18.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.49B and revenue of 3.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.1%.
UL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported an operating income of 4.13B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.
WMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.32B and revenue of 3.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 43.6%.
UL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
WMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Williams Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 865.00M and revenue of 3.03B, resulting in a net margin of 28.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UL and WMB have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WMB has higher volatility (7.36%) compared to UL (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UL dropped -53.55% vs WMB's -98.03%.
WMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UL and WMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer