PortfoliosLab logo
UL vs. IVZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between UL and IVZ is -0.80. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

UL vs. IVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Unilever Group (UL) and Invesco Ltd. (IVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

UL:

21.90%

IVZ:

26.03%

Max Drawdown

UL:

-2.51%

IVZ:

-1.05%

Current Drawdown

UL:

-2.51%

IVZ:

0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UL:

$153.47B

IVZ:

$6.64B

EPS

UL:

$2.59

IVZ:

$1.25

PE Ratio

UL:

24.13

IVZ:

11.86

PEG Ratio

UL:

3.03

IVZ:

1.62

PS Ratio

UL:

2.53

IVZ:

1.08

PB Ratio

UL:

6.79

IVZ:

0.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

UL:

$60.76B

IVZ:

$6.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UL:

$60.76B

IVZ:

$2.93B

EBITDA (TTM)

UL:

$13.01B

IVZ:

$1.23B

Returns By Period


UL

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

IVZ

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

UL vs. IVZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UL is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UL is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UL is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UL is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UL is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UL is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

IVZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IVZ is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IVZ is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IVZ is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IVZ is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IVZ is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IVZ is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

UL vs. IVZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Unilever Group (UL) and Invesco Ltd. (IVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

UL vs. IVZ - Dividend Comparison

UL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than IVZ's 5.53% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
UL
The Unilever Group
3.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVZ
Invesco Ltd.
5.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UL vs. IVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UL drawdown since its inception was -2.51%, which is greater than IVZ's maximum drawdown of -1.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UL and IVZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

UL vs. IVZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

UL vs. IVZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Unilever Group and Invesco Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20212022202320242025
29.64B
1.53B
(UL) Total Revenue
(IVZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UL vs. IVZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Unilever Group and Invesco Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
99.3%
(UL) Gross Margin
(IVZ) Gross Margin
UL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Unilever Group reported a gross profit of 29.64B and revenue of 29.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

IVZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Invesco Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.52B and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.3%.

UL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Unilever Group reported an operating income of 3.45B and revenue of 29.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

IVZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Invesco Ltd. reported an operating income of 277.30M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.

UL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Unilever Group reported a net income of 2.04B and revenue of 29.64B, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.

IVZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Invesco Ltd. reported a net income of 230.30M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.