PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
UL vs. IVZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ULIVZ
YTD Return33.16%8.53%
1Y Return34.67%53.57%
3Y Return (Ann)10.17%-5.23%
5Y Return (Ann)4.54%8.15%
10Y Return (Ann)7.92%-2.69%
Sharpe Ratio2.261.60
Sortino Ratio3.512.09
Omega Ratio1.451.28
Calmar Ratio1.860.64
Martin Ratio14.635.01
Ulcer Index2.38%10.11%
Daily Std Dev15.35%31.61%
Max Drawdown-53.55%-91.11%
Current Drawdown-4.03%-66.26%

Fundamentals


ULIVZ
Market Cap$156.96B$8.23B
EPS$2.86-$0.74
PEG Ratio16.971.62
Total Revenue (TTM)$60.29B$4.38B
Gross Profit (TTM)$25.86B$2.29B
EBITDA (TTM)$11.95B$829.60M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between UL and IVZ is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

UL vs. IVZ - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, UL achieves a 33.16% return, which is significantly higher than IVZ's 8.53% return. Over the past 10 years, UL has outperformed IVZ with an annualized return of 7.92%, while IVZ has yielded a comparatively lower -2.69% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
33.12%
22.66%
UL
IVZ

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

UL vs. IVZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Unilever Group (UL) and Invesco Ltd. (IVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UL, currently valued at 2.26, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.26
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for UL, currently valued at 3.51, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.51
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for UL, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for UL, currently valued at 1.86, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.86
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for UL, currently valued at 14.63, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0014.63
IVZ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IVZ, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.60
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IVZ, currently valued at 2.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IVZ, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IVZ, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.64
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IVZ, currently valued at 5.01, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.005.01

UL vs. IVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UL Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the IVZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UL and IVZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
2.26
1.60
UL
IVZ

Dividends

UL vs. IVZ - Dividend Comparison

UL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than IVZ's 4.35% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
UL
The Unilever Group
2.93%3.83%3.61%3.77%3.07%3.18%3.49%2.82%3.44%3.06%3.72%3.39%
IVZ
Invesco Ltd.
4.35%4.41%4.07%2.89%4.45%6.84%7.11%3.15%3.66%3.17%2.47%2.33%

Drawdowns

UL vs. IVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UL drawdown since its inception was -53.55%, smaller than the maximum IVZ drawdown of -91.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UL and IVZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-4.03%
-66.26%
UL
IVZ

Volatility

UL vs. IVZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Unilever Group (UL) is 3.25%, while Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) has a volatility of 7.46%. This indicates that UL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
3.25%
7.46%
UL
IVZ

Financials

UL vs. IVZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Unilever Group and Invesco Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items